Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
PicoClaw vs ZeroClaw
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against PicoClaw's 46.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
PicoClaw D
Best for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No commit on main since 19 August 2026 and no release since v0.3.1 on 3 July 2026. An issue of 6 October calls the repository unmaintained, with no reply
ZeroClaw BB
Best for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 74 against 54
- Schema & documentation, 82 against 51
- Agent ergonomics, 72 against 66
- Security & auth, 76 against 51
- Maintenance & community, 80 against 22
- Transparency & trust, 64 against 56
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The docs state that command execution is not audited. [security.audit] records certificate events only, and tool receipts are opt-in and not durable
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | PicoClaw | ZeroClaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 74 | ZeroClaw +20 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 51 | 82 | ZeroClaw +31 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 66 | 72 | ZeroClaw +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 51 | 76 | ZeroClaw +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 22 | 80 | ZeroClaw +58 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 64 | ZeroClaw +8 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -7 | -3 | |
| Total | D 46.1/100 | BB 70.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | PicoClaw | ZeroClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Sipeed | ZeroClaw Labs |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT OR Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-03 | 2026-09-05 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 30k stars | 33k stars |
Verdicts
PicoClaw
Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with 19 documented chat channels, scheduled and heartbeat tasks, and local file memory. The repository has had no commit since 19 August 2026 and no release since 3 July, and 15 CVEs are listed against it with no advisory or security policy from the project.
ZeroClaw
Supervised autonomy is the default, so tools outside a short read-only list wait for the owner's approval, and secrets are encrypted in the config file. The docs state that command execution is not written to an audit log, and the project publishes no privacy policy or terms.
Before you call either
PicoClaw
- Set
allow_fromto the owner's user ID on every channel before starting the gateway. An empty list accepts messages from anyone - Set
tools.exec.allow_remotetofalseunless chats must run shell commands. The shipped default istrue, whatever docs/guides/configuration.md says - Set
isolation.enabledtotrueon Linux (needsbwrap) or run in a container. The deny patterns do not inspect child processes - Use
PICOCLAW_KEY_PASSPHRASEfor credential encryption. One docs page namesPICOCLAW_CREDENTIAL_PASSPHRASE, which the source does not read - Treat the README's ClawdChat line (read a remote skill file and follow it) as untrusted third-party instructions
ZeroClaw
- Keep
[risk_profiles.<alias>] level = "supervised".fullruns every tool not listed inalways_ask, and the YOLO preset removes the sandbox and path rules too - Add sending and account tools such as
send_via,google_workspaceandhttp_requesttoalways_askso a session-level Always grant cannot skip the prompt - List senders in
[peer_groups.<name>] external_peers.["*"]accepts anyone on that channel - Set
[web_fetch].allowed_domainsand[http_request].allowed_domains. Fetches run unprompted and the OS sandbox does not block egress - Run one-shot tasks with
zeroclaw agent -a <alias> -m "<task>". A cron or webhook turn has no prompt, so shell calls fall to the command policy
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, PicoClaw or ZeroClaw?
ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against PicoClaw's 46.1 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are PicoClaw and ZeroClaw open source?
Yes. PicoClaw is open source (MIT). ZeroClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with PicoClaw or ZeroClaw
- AstrBot vs PicoClaw
- AstrBot vs ZeroClaw
- CowAgent vs PicoClaw
- CowAgent vs ZeroClaw
- GAIA vs PicoClaw
- GAIA vs ZeroClaw
- Gemini Spark vs PicoClaw
- Gemini Spark vs ZeroClaw
- Grok Bot vs PicoClaw
- Grok Bot vs ZeroClaw
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs ZeroClaw
- Hermes Agent vs PicoClaw
- Hermes Agent vs ZeroClaw
- Instinct vs PicoClaw
- Instinct vs ZeroClaw
- IronClaw vs PicoClaw
- IronClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs PicoClaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- nanobot vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs ZeroClaw
- NanoClaw vs PicoClaw
- NanoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- Dots vs PicoClaw
- Dots vs ZeroClaw
- OpenClaw vs PicoClaw
- OpenClaw vs ZeroClaw
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs Zo Computer
- Poke vs ZeroClaw
- QwenPaw vs ZeroClaw
- ZeroClaw vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/picoclaw-vs-zeroclaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/picoclaw.json·/api/v1/tools/zeroclaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare picoclaw zeroclaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "picoclaw", "b": "zeroclaw"}at/mcp, no key