Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

PicoClaw vs Tomo

PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

PicoClawSipeed · Agent harness D46.1/100#881 of 993 TomoMapo Labs, Inc. · Platform F13.1/100#989 of 993

Which one, for what

PicoClaw D

Best for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 54 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 51 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 66 against 0
  • Security & auth, 51 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 10
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 47

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

No commit on main since 19 August 2026 and no release since v0.3.1 on 3 July 2026. An issue of 6 October calls the repository unmaintained, with no reply

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 54 against 22

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where PicoClaw loses 7 points for them

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPicoClawTomoEdge
Reliability16%205415PicoClaw +39
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2510PicoClaw +51
Agent ergonomics13%16.2660PicoClaw +66
Security & auth14%17.5510PicoClaw +51
Payments & pricing10%12.56010PicoClaw +50
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.82254Tomo +32
Transparency & trust7%8.85647PicoClaw +9
Negative events≤15-70
TotalD 46.1/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactPicoClawTomo
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorSipeedMapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceMITClosed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Last release2026-07-032026-09-29
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity30k starsnone

Verdicts

PicoClaw

Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with 19 documented chat channels, scheduled and heartbeat tasks, and local file memory. The repository has had no commit since 19 August 2026 and no release since 3 July, and 15 CVEs are listed against it with no advisory or security policy from the project.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

PicoClaw

  1. Set allow_from to the owner's user ID on every channel before starting the gateway. An empty list accepts messages from anyone
  2. Set tools.exec.allow_remote to false unless chats must run shell commands. The shipped default is true, whatever docs/guides/configuration.md says
  3. Set isolation.enabled to true on Linux (needs bwrap) or run in a container. The deny patterns do not inspect child processes
  4. Use PICOCLAW_KEY_PASSPHRASE for credential encryption. One docs page names PICOCLAW_CREDENTIAL_PASSPHRASE, which the source does not read
  5. Treat the README's ClawdChat line (read a remote skill file and follow it) as untrusted third-party instructions

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, PicoClaw or Tomo?

PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tomo leads on maintenance & community.

Are PicoClaw and Tomo open source?

PicoClaw is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Tomo.

Other comparisons with PicoClaw or Tomo

Disclosure

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report