Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

GAIA vs Tomo

GAIA scores 49.5 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

GAIAThe Experience Company · Platform D49.5/100#815 of 993 TomoMapo Labs, Inc. · Platform F13.1/100#989 of 993

Which one, for what

GAIA D

Best for It suits one person who wants mail triage, meeting briefs, todos and scheduled workflows from one assistant reachable on WhatsApp, Telegram, Slack, Discord or iMessage, and who wants to read the source.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 67 against 15
  • Schema & documentation, 51 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 54 against 0
  • Security & auth, 54 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 20 against 10
  • Maintenance & community, 78 against 54
  • Transparency & trust, 60 against 47

Watch for

The default approval mode in the source is always_allow, commented as nothing gated, while the privacy policy and the 26 August release notes say destructive actions wait for approval.

Tomo F

Best for People who want accountability, check-ins and reminders by text, including in group chats.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where GAIA loses 5 points for them

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGAIATomoEdge
Reliability16%206715GAIA +52
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2510GAIA +51
Agent ergonomics13%16.2540GAIA +54
Security & auth14%17.5540GAIA +54
Payments & pricing10%12.52010GAIA +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87854GAIA +24
Transparency & trust7%8.86047GAIA +13
Negative events≤15-50
TotalD 49.5/100F 13.1/100

Facts side by side

FactGAIATomo
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorThe Experience CompanyMapo Labs, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingPaidPaid
x402nono
LicencePolyForm-Noncommercial-1.0.0Closed service under Tomo's Terms of Service (Mapo Labs, Inc., last updated 24 September 2026).
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-142026-09-29
Terms last updated2026-08-14
Privacy policy last updated2026-08-07
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity308 starsnone

Verdicts

GAIA

GAIA's source is public, so its approval gate, memory store and token handling can be read. Three approval modes and per-tool overrides exist, but the default mode in the source runs every action unasked, which the privacy policy and release notes do not say. Pro costs $30 a month and self-hosting is limited to noncommercial use.

Tomo

Tomo is a hosted personal AI over iMessage and an iOS app, centred on goals, check-ins and reminders, with regular iOS releases since April 2026. No outside agent can call it, there's no free plan, and no status page, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

GAIA

  1. Set Settings > Approvals to Always ask or Auto before connecting mail. The default in the source runs every action, including send and delete, without asking.
  2. Expect no public API on the hosted service. The backend turns off its OpenAPI document in production, so reach GAIA through its apps, bots or CLI.
  3. Check the plan before relying on the hosted service. The README and docs describe a Free plan, and the pricing page says GAIA is a paid product.
  4. For self-hosting, prepare Docker, Node.js 20, a WorkOS account and a model key first, and confirm the use is noncommercial under the licence.
  5. Add outside tools as MCP servers by URL on the Integrations page. GAIA asks before adding a server in every approval mode.

Tomo

  1. Don't plan to call Tomo from another agent. It answers only the owner's iMessage, group chats it's added to and the iOS app.
  2. Tell the owner that adding Tomo to a group chat applies its terms to every participant.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, GAIA or Tomo?

GAIA scores 49.5 (D) on agent readiness against Tomo's 13.1 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Other comparisons with GAIA or Tomo

Disclosure

Tomo competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report