Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
Leon vs PicoClaw
PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Leon E
Best for A developer who wants a self-hosted assistant with memory, computer use and a local model, and who will read the source.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where PicoClaw loses 7 points for them
Watch for
No tagged release of the core since 1.0.0-beta.8 on 1 May 2023. The 2.0 Developer Preview is installed by cloning the develop branch
PicoClaw D
Best for A person who wants a chat-app assistant on a cheap Linux board, an old Android phone or a home server, with reminders, web search and file memory, and who accepts running software its maker calls pre-production.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 54 against 32
- Schema & documentation, 51 against 33
- Agent ergonomics, 66 against 57
- Security & auth, 51 against 34
- Maintenance & community, 22 against 15
Watch for
No commit on main since 19 August 2026 and no release since v0.3.1 on 3 July 2026. An issue of 6 October calls the repository unmaintained, with no reply
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Leon | PicoClaw | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 32 | 54 | PicoClaw +22 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 33 | 51 | PicoClaw +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 66 | PicoClaw +9 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 34 | 51 | PicoClaw +17 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 15 | 22 | PicoClaw +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 56 | Leon +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -7 | |
| Total | E 41/100 | D 46.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Leon | PicoClaw |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Louis Grenard (Leon AI) | Sipeed |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | None |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2023-05-01 | 2026-07-03 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 18k stars | 30k stars |
Verdicts
Leon
Connected-app credentials are encrypted per profile and the Gmail connection is read-only. The 2.0 Developer Preview has no tagged release, runs tools and a 30-minute proactive pulse with no approval step, listens on every network interface with client authentication off, and sends telemetry by default.
PicoClaw
Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with 19 documented chat channels, scheduled and heartbeat tasks, and local file memory. The repository has had no commit since 19 August 2026 and no release since 3 July, and 15 CVEs are listed against it with no advisory or security policy from the project.
Before you call either
Leon
- Clone the develop branch for 2.0.
npm install --global @leon-ai/cliand docs.getleon.ai install and describe the legacy 1.0 betas - Set
client_interface.auth.enabled: trueand aLEON_PROFILE_TOKENbefore the machine joins a shared network. The server binds 0.0.0.0 - Set
telemetry_enabled: falseandruntime.pulse_enabled: falsein the profileconfig.ymlfor an unattended or private run - Use
availability.tools.allowedto limit tools. Shell, file writes, computer use and browser control are otherwise available to the agent with no approval prompt - Back up
LEON_CONNECTIONS_ENCRYPTION_KEYfrom the profile.env. Without it the stored connections cannot be read
PicoClaw
- Set
allow_fromto the owner's user ID on every channel before starting the gateway. An empty list accepts messages from anyone - Set
tools.exec.allow_remotetofalseunless chats must run shell commands. The shipped default istrue, whatever docs/guides/configuration.md says - Set
isolation.enabledtotrueon Linux (needsbwrap) or run in a container. The deny patterns do not inspect child processes - Use
PICOCLAW_KEY_PASSPHRASEfor credential encryption. One docs page namesPICOCLAW_CREDENTIAL_PASSPHRASE, which the source does not read - Treat the README's ClawdChat line (read a remote skill file and follow it) as untrusted third-party instructions
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Leon or PicoClaw?
PicoClaw scores 46.1 (D) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Are Leon and PicoClaw open source?
Yes. Leon is open source (MIT). PicoClaw is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Leon or PicoClaw
- AstrBot vs Leon
- AstrBot vs PicoClaw
- CowAgent vs Leon
- CowAgent vs PicoClaw
- GAIA vs Leon
- GAIA vs PicoClaw
- Gemini Spark vs Leon
- Gemini Spark vs PicoClaw
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs PicoClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Haven vs PicoClaw
- Hermes Agent vs Leon
- Hermes Agent vs PicoClaw
- Instinct vs Leon
- Instinct vs PicoClaw
- IronClaw vs Leon
- IronClaw vs PicoClaw
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs nanobot
- Leon vs NanoClaw
- Leon vs Dots
- Leon vs OpenClaw
- Leon vs Poke
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- nanobot vs PicoClaw
- NanoClaw vs PicoClaw
- Dots vs PicoClaw
- OpenClaw vs PicoClaw
- PicoClaw vs Poke
- PicoClaw vs QwenPaw
- PicoClaw vs ZeroClaw
- PicoClaw vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/leon-vs-picoclaw.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/leon.json·/api/v1/tools/picoclaw.json - From a terminal
anchor compare leon picoclaw(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "leon", "b": "picoclaw"}at/mcp, no key