Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run
IronClaw vs Leon
IronClaw scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do assistant proactive.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
IronClaw B
Best for One technical owner who wants a self-hosted assistant over Gmail, Calendar, Slack and Telegram with credentials kept out of the model's reach.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 67 against 32
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 33
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 57
- Security & auth, 66 against 34
- Maintenance & community, 74 against 15
- Transparency & trust, 75 against 60
Watch for
Global auto-approve defaults to on in the 1.4.1 source, so tools marked ask (send, trash, delete) run without a prompt. Only financial, approval and budget effects always ask
Leon E
Best for A developer who wants a self-hosted assistant with memory, computer use and a local model, and who will read the source.
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
No tagged release of the core since 1.0.0-beta.8 on 1 May 2023. The 2.0 Developer Preview is installed by cloning the develop branch
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | IronClaw | Leon | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 67 | 32 | IronClaw +35 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 74 | 33 | IronClaw +41 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 57 | IronClaw +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 34 | IronClaw +32 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 15 | IronClaw +59 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 75 | 60 | IronClaw +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | B 66.7/100 | E 41/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | IronClaw | Leon |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | NEAR AI | Louis Grenard (Leon AI) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT OR Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-09-29 | 2023-05-01 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 13k stars | 18k stars |
Verdicts
IronClaw
Credentials stay in an encrypted store and are injected at the host boundary, and extensions declare per-tool permissions, network targets and OAuth scopes. The global auto-approve setting defaults to on in the 1.4.1 source, so tools marked ask, such as gmail.send_message, run unprompted until the owner turns it off.
Leon
Connected-app credentials are encrypted per profile and the Gmail connection is read-only. The 2.0 Developer Preview has no tagged release, runs tools and a 30-minute proactive pulse with no approval step, listens on every network interface with client authentication off, and sends telemetry by default.
Before you call either
IronClaw
- Open Settings and turn off global auto-approve, or set send and delete tools to ask each time, before connecting mail or chat accounts
- Install with the release installer and run
ironclaw onboard. 1.x does not migrate 0.29 data, so use a fresh home directory - Call
POST /api/v1/responseswith the bearer token from~/.ironclaw/reborn/webui-token. Keep under 30 requests in 60 seconds - Resolve approval and OAuth gates in the web interface. The Responses API fails the turn instead of surfacing them
- Connect MCP servers over HTTP only. The stdio transport is rejected
Leon
- Clone the develop branch for 2.0.
npm install --global @leon-ai/cliand docs.getleon.ai install and describe the legacy 1.0 betas - Set
client_interface.auth.enabled: trueand aLEON_PROFILE_TOKENbefore the machine joins a shared network. The server binds 0.0.0.0 - Set
telemetry_enabled: falseandruntime.pulse_enabled: falsein the profileconfig.ymlfor an unattended or private run - Use
availability.tools.allowedto limit tools. Shell, file writes, computer use and browser control are otherwise available to the agent with no approval prompt - Back up
LEON_CONNECTIONS_ENCRYPTION_KEYfrom the profile.env. Without it the stored connections cannot be read
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, IronClaw or Leon?
IronClaw scores 66.7 (B) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are IronClaw and Leon open source?
Yes. IronClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0). Leon is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with IronClaw or Leon
- AstrBot vs IronClaw
- AstrBot vs Leon
- CowAgent vs IronClaw
- CowAgent vs Leon
- GAIA vs IronClaw
- GAIA vs Leon
- Gemini Spark vs IronClaw
- Gemini Spark vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs IronClaw
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Haven vs IronClaw
- Haven vs Leon
- Hermes Agent vs IronClaw
- Hermes Agent vs Leon
- Instinct vs IronClaw
- Instinct vs Leon
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs nanobot
- IronClaw vs NanoClaw
- IronClaw vs Dots
- IronClaw vs OpenClaw
- IronClaw vs PicoClaw
- IronClaw vs Poke
- IronClaw vs QwenPaw
- IronClaw vs ZeroClaw
- IronClaw vs Zo Computer
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs nanobot
- Leon vs NanoClaw
- Leon vs Dots
- Leon vs OpenClaw
- Leon vs PicoClaw
- Leon vs Poke
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs Zo Computer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/ironclaw-vs-leon.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/ironclaw.json·/api/v1/tools/leon.json - From a terminal
anchor compare ironclaw leon(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "ironclaw", "b": "leon"}at/mcp, no key