Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Leon vs Wajo (Fo)
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Leon leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Leon E
Best for A developer who wants a self-hosted assistant with memory, computer use and a local model, and who will read the source.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 15 against 3
- Transparency & trust, 60 against 47
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
No tagged release of the core since 1.0.0-beta.8 on 1 May 2023. The 2.0 Developer Preview is installed by cloning the develop branch
Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 33
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 57
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No status page, changelog or security contact found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Leon | Wajo (Fo) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 32 | 30 | Leon +2 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 33 | 74 | Wajo (Fo) +41 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 57 | 68 | Wajo (Fo) +11 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 34 | 38 | Wajo (Fo) +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | Leon +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 15 | 3 | Leon +12 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 60 | 47 | Leon +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | E 41/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Leon | Wajo (Fo) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Platform |
| Vendor | Louis Grenard (Leon AI) | Wajo, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026). |
| Tools exposed | none | 21 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2023-05-01 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 18k stars | none |
Verdicts
Leon
Connected-app credentials are encrypted per profile and the Gmail connection is read-only. The 2.0 Developer Preview has no tagged release, runs tools and a 30-minute proactive pulse with no approval step, listens on every network interface with client authentication off, and sends telemetry by default.
Wajo (Fo)
Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Before you call either
Leon
- Clone the develop branch for 2.0.
npm install --global @leon-ai/cliand docs.getleon.ai install and describe the legacy 1.0 betas - Set
client_interface.auth.enabled: trueand aLEON_PROFILE_TOKENbefore the machine joins a shared network. The server binds 0.0.0.0 - Set
telemetry_enabled: falseandruntime.pulse_enabled: falsein the profileconfig.ymlfor an unattended or private run - Use
availability.tools.allowedto limit tools. Shell, file writes, computer use and browser control are otherwise available to the agent with no approval prompt - Back up
LEON_CONNECTIONS_ENCRYPTION_KEYfrom the profile.env. Without it the stored connections cannot be read
Wajo (Fo)
- Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
- Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
- After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
- Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
- Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Leon or Wajo (Fo)?
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Leon's 41 (E), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Leon leads on payments & pricing, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Are Leon and Wajo (Fo) open source?
Leon is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Wajo (Fo).
Other comparisons with Leon or Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs Leon
- CowAgent vs Leon
- GAIA vs Leon
- Gemini Spark vs Leon
- Grok Bot vs Leon
- Haven vs Leon
- Hermes Agent vs Leon
- Instinct vs Leon
- IronClaw vs Leon
- Leon vs Lindy
- Leon vs nanobot
- Leon vs NanoClaw
- Leon vs Dots
- Leon vs OpenClaw
- Leon vs PicoClaw
- Leon vs Poke
- Leon vs QwenPaw
- Leon vs ZeroClaw
- Leon vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Wajo (Fo)
- GAIA vs Wajo (Fo)
- Gemini Spark vs Wajo (Fo)
- Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hermes Agent vs Wajo (Fo)
- Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)
- IronClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Leon vs Natura tinyNature
- Leon vs Pally
- Leon vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)
- NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Wajo (Fo)
- Dots vs Wajo (Fo)
- OpenClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Wajo (Fo)
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer
- Leon vs Talorys
- PicoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Wajo (Fo)
Disclosure
Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/leon-vs-wajo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/leon.json·/api/v1/tools/wajo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare leon wajo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "leon", "b": "wajo"}at/mcp, no key