Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run
Dots vs Wajo (Fo)
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Dots's 28.3 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Dots leads on security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Dots F
Best for A ChatGPT Pro or Enterprise user who wants ongoing work tracked across mail, documents, code and Slack with approval before sends.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 58 against 38
- Maintenance & community, 38 against 3
Watch for
Beta. The admin setting is labelled Use dots (Beta), access is rolling out gradually, and Teams access is an invite-only alpha
Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 30 against 3
- Schema & documentation, 74 against 41
- Agent ergonomics, 68 against 22
- Payments & pricing, 30 against 10
- Transparency & trust, 47 against 31
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
Watch for
No status page, changelog or security contact found.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Dots | Wajo (Fo) | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 3 | 30 | Wajo (Fo) +27 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 41 | 74 | Wajo (Fo) +33 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 22 | 68 | Wajo (Fo) +46 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 38 | Dots +20 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 10 | 30 | Wajo (Fo) +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 38 | 3 | Dots +35 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 31 | 47 | Wajo (Fo) +16 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | F 28.3/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Dots | Wajo (Fo) |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | OpenAI | Wajo, Inc. |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary hosted service. The governing terms were not read | Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026). |
| Tools exposed | none | 21 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | none |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver |
Verdicts
Dots
Actions that affect accounts or share information pass an automatic review, and custom rules can require approval or a hand-off. Dots is a beta on Pro plans from $100 a month, and no status page, terms, privacy policy or way to delete individual saved notes was found in the pages we could read.
Wajo (Fo)
Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.
Before you call either
Dots
- Say what may be sent. Asking a dot to draft replies does not permit sending them, and an action outside a stated scope needs another decision
- Stop three things separately. Pause stops the main task only, delegated tasks stop in Activity and recurring tasks in Scheduled, and completed actions are not undone
- Connect each thing separately. A messaging channel grants no access to an inbox, an app or a computer
- Sign out of websites and disconnect apps yourself when removing access. Revoking dots access or disconnecting an app does not delete information already obtained
- Keep the connected computer online with the ChatGPT app open for local work. Only one personal computer can be connected at a time
Wajo (Fo)
- Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
- Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
- After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
- Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
- Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Dots or Wajo (Fo)?
Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Dots's 28.3 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Dots leads on security & auth and maintenance & community.
Other comparisons with Dots or Wajo (Fo)
- AstrBot vs Dots
- CowAgent vs Dots
- GAIA vs Dots
- Gemini Spark vs Dots
- Grok Bot vs Dots
- Haven vs Dots
- Hermes Agent vs Dots
- Instinct vs Dots
- IronClaw vs Dots
- Leon vs Dots
- Lindy vs Dots
- nanobot vs Dots
- NanoClaw vs Dots
- Dots vs OpenClaw
- Dots vs PicoClaw
- Dots vs Poke
- Dots vs QwenPaw
- Dots vs ZeroClaw
- Dots vs Zo Computer
- CowAgent vs Wajo (Fo)
- GAIA vs Wajo (Fo)
- Gemini Spark vs Wajo (Fo)
- Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)
- Haven vs Wajo (Fo)
- Hermes Agent vs Wajo (Fo)
- Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)
- IronClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Leon vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)
- NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Natura tinyNature vs Dots
- Natura tinyNature vs Wajo (Fo)
- Dots vs Pally
- Dots vs Tomo
- OpenClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Pally vs Wajo (Fo)
- Poke vs Wajo (Fo)
- QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)
- Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw
- Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer
- Dots vs Talorys
- PicoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)
- Talorys vs Wajo (Fo)
Disclosure
Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/openai-dots.json·/api/v1/tools/wajo.json - From a terminal
anchor compare openai-dots wajo(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "openai-dots", "b": "wajo"}at/mcp, no key