# Dots vs Wajo (Fo) > Wajo scores 43.9 (E) to Dots's 28.3 (F) for assistants that act in your accounts. Prices, MCP, x402, uptime and agent notes side by side. - Canonical: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo - Markdown: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.md (~2,750 tokens) - Slim: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.min.md (~580 tokens, same facts, less prose, for token-sensitive contexts) - JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.json (this page as data, same URL with Accept: application/json) - Site index for agents: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms.txt (full text: https://www.anchorterminal.com/llms-full.txt) - API: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/index.json - Updated: 2026-10-12 Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Dots's 28.3 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Dots leads on security & auth and maintenance & community. Both do assistants that act in your accounts. - Dots: grade F, 28.3/100, rank #977 of 993. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/openai-dots.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/openai-dots.json - Wajo (Fo): grade E, 43.9/100, rank #907 of 993. Markdown https://www.anchorterminal.com/tools/wajo.md · JSON https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/wajo.json - Best AI personal assistants that act for one person: https://www.anchorterminal.com/best/personal-assistants/index.md - All 314 assistants comparisons: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/personal-assistants/index.md ## Which one, for what ### Dots (F) Good for: A ChatGPT Pro or Enterprise user who wants ongoing work tracked across mail, documents, code and Slack with approval before sends. Ahead on: - Security & auth, 58 against 38 - Maintenance & community, 38 against 3 Watch for: Beta. The admin setting is labelled Use dots (Beta), access is rolling out gradually, and Teams access is an invite-only alpha ### Wajo (Fo) (E) Good for: An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP. Ahead on: - Reliability, 30 against 3 - Schema & documentation, 74 against 41 - Agent ergonomics, 68 against 22 - Payments & pricing, 30 against 10 - Transparency & trust, 47 against 31 Also in its favour: - A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install Watch for: No status page, changelog or security contact found. ## Score by category | Category | Weight | Dots | Wajo (Fo) | Edge | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | Reliability | 16% (20 this run) | 3 | 30 | Wajo (Fo) +27 | | Performance | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Schema & documentation | 13% (16.2 this run) | 41 | 74 | Wajo (Fo) +33 | | Agent ergonomics | 13% (16.2 this run) | 22 | 68 | Wajo (Fo) +46 | | Security & auth | 14% (17.5 this run) | 58 | 38 | Dots +20 | | Payments & pricing | 10% (12.5 this run) | 10 | 30 | Wajo (Fo) +20 | | Task success | 10%, pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run | | Maintenance & community | 7% (8.8 this run) | 38 | 3 | Dots +35 | | Transparency & trust | 7% (8.8 this run) | 31 | 47 | Wajo (Fo) +16 | | Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | | | **Total** | | **28.3 · F** | **43.9 · E** | | ## Facts side by side | Fact | Dots | Wajo (Fo) | | --- | --- | --- | | Kind | Platform | Platform | | Vendor | OpenAI | Wajo, Inc. | | Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | `https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp` | | Transports | | Streamable HTTP | | Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key | | Pricing | Paid | Freemium | | x402 | no | no | | Licence | Proprietary hosted service. The governing terms were not read | Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026). | | Tools exposed | none | 21 | | Read-only variant documented | no | no | | llms.txt | yes | yes | | Last release | 2026-10-09 | none | | Terms last updated | no document linked | | | Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | | | Customer content may train models | | | | Terms restrict automated access | | | | Terms restrict benchmarking | | | | Terms or service can change without notice | | | | Arbitration or class-action waiver | | | ## Verdicts **Dots.** Actions that affect accounts or share information pass an automatic review, and custom rules can require approval or a hand-off. Dots is a beta on Pro plans from $100 a month, and no status page, terms, privacy policy or way to delete individual saved notes was found in the pages we could read. **Wajo (Fo).** Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found. ## Before you call either ### Dots 1. Say what may be sent. Asking a dot to draft replies does not permit sending them, and an action outside a stated scope needs another decision 2. Stop three things separately. Pause stops the main task only, delegated tasks stop in Activity and recurring tasks in Scheduled, and completed actions are not undone 3. Connect each thing separately. A messaging channel grants no access to an inbox, an app or a computer 4. Sign out of websites and disconnect apps yourself when removing access. Revoking dots access or disconnecting an app does not delete information already obtained 5. Keep the connected computer online with the ChatGPT app open for local work. Only one personal computer can be connected at a time ### Wajo (Fo) 1. Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead. 2. Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL. 3. After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working. 4. Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool. 5. Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites. ## Questions ### Which is better for AI agents, Dots or Wajo (Fo)? Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Dots's 28.3 (F), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Dots leads on security & auth and maintenance & community. ## For agents - This comparison as JSON: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.json, and with the fewest tokens: https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-wajo.min.md - Over MCP at https://www.anchorterminal.com/mcp (no key): `compare_tools {"a": "openai-dots", "b": "wajo"}`. From a terminal: `anchor compare openai-dots wajo` - Each listing in full: https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/openai-dots.json and https://www.anchorterminal.com/api/v1/tools/wajo.json ## Other comparisons with Dots or Wajo (Fo) - [AstrBot vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/astrbot-vs-openai-dots.md) - [CowAgent vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cowagent-vs-openai-dots.md) - [GAIA vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gaia-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Gemini Spark vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-spark-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Grok Bot vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Haven vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Hermes Agent vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hermes-agent-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Instinct vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/instinct-vs-openai-dots.md) - [IronClaw vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ironclaw-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Leon vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leon-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Lindy vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lindy-vs-openai-dots.md) - [nanobot vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanobot-vs-openai-dots.md) - [NanoClaw vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanoclaw-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Dots vs OpenClaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-openclaw.md) - [Dots vs PicoClaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-picoclaw.md) - [Dots vs Poke](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-poke.md) - [Dots vs QwenPaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-qwenpaw.md) - [Dots vs ZeroClaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-zeroclaw.md) - [Dots vs Zo Computer](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-zo-computer.md) - [CowAgent vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/cowagent-vs-wajo.md) - [GAIA vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gaia-vs-wajo.md) - [Gemini Spark vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/gemini-spark-vs-wajo.md) - [Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/grok-bot-vs-wajo.md) - [Haven vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/haven-vs-wajo.md) - [Hermes Agent vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/hermes-agent-vs-wajo.md) - [Instinct vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/instinct-vs-wajo.md) - [IronClaw vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/ironclaw-vs-wajo.md) - [Leon vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/leon-vs-wajo.md) - [Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/lindy-vs-wajo.md) - [nanobot vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanobot-vs-wajo.md) - [NanoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/nanoclaw-vs-wajo.md) - [Natura tinyNature vs Dots](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/natura-vs-openai-dots.md) - [Natura tinyNature vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/natura-vs-wajo.md) - [Dots vs Pally](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-pally.md) - [Dots vs Tomo](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-tomo.md) - [OpenClaw vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openclaw-vs-wajo.md) - [Pally vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/pally-vs-wajo.md) - [Poke vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/poke-vs-wajo.md) - [QwenPaw vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/qwenpaw-vs-wajo.md) - [Tomo vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/tomo-vs-wajo.md) - [Wajo (Fo) vs ZeroClaw](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wajo-vs-zeroclaw.md) - [Wajo (Fo) vs Zo Computer](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/wajo-vs-zo-computer.md) - [Dots vs Talorys](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/openai-dots-vs-talorys.md) - [PicoClaw vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/picoclaw-vs-wajo.md) - [Talorys vs Wajo (Fo)](https://www.anchorterminal.com/compare/talorys-vs-wajo.md) ## Disclosure - Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.