Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

Asmi vs Wajo (Fo)

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.3 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Asmi leads on security & auth. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

AsmiHumint Labs, Inc. · Platform F33.3/100#973 of 1010 Wajo (Fo)Wajo, Inc. · Platform E43.9/100#909 of 1010

Which one, for what

Asmi F

Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 49 against 38

Watch for

Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).

Wajo (Fo) E

Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 74 against 20
  • Agent ergonomics, 68 against 43

Watch for

No status page, changelog or security contact found.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAsmiWajo (Fo)Edge
Reliability16%203030even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.22074Wajo (Fo) +54
Agent ergonomics13%16.24368Wajo (Fo) +25
Security & auth14%17.54938Asmi +11
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.833even
Transparency & trust7%8.85147Asmi +4
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 33.3/100E 43.9/100

Facts side by side

FactAsmiWajo (Fo)
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorHumint Labs, Inc.Wajo, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTPStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026).Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026).
Tools exposed1221
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Asmi

Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.

Wajo (Fo)

Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Asmi

  1. Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
  2. Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
  3. Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
  4. Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
  5. Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.

Wajo (Fo)

  1. Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
  2. Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
  3. After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
  4. Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
  5. Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or Wajo (Fo)?

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Asmi's 33.3 (F), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Asmi leads on security & auth.

Other comparisons with Asmi or Wajo (Fo)

Disclosure

Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report