Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

Asmi vs Tab

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Tab's 10.7 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tab leads on maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

AsmiHumint Labs, Inc. · Platform F33.3/100#973 of 1010 TabTerrasoft, Inc. · Platform F10.7/100#1003 of 1010

Which one, for what

Asmi F

Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 30 against 5
  • Schema & documentation, 20 against 0
  • Agent ergonomics, 43 against 0
  • Security & auth, 49 against 4
  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 0
  • Transparency & trust, 51 against 45

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).

Tab F

Best for A person who wants a texting assistant that browses, calls and buys with tight checkout controls.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 58 against 3

Watch for

Private beta behind a waitlist.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAsmiTabEdge
Reliability16%20305Asmi +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.2200Asmi +20
Agent ergonomics13%16.2430Asmi +43
Security & auth14%17.5494Asmi +45
Payments & pricing10%12.5300Asmi +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8358Tab +55
Transparency & trust7%8.85145Asmi +6
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 33.3/100F 10.7/100

Facts side by side

FactAsmiTab
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorHumint Labs, Inc.Terrasoft, Inc.
Hosted endpointhttps://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/no (local only)
TransportsStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026).Closed service under Tab's Terms of Use (Terrasoft, Inc., effective 2 September 2026).
Tools exposed12none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnono
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Asmi

Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.

Tab

Tab is a private-beta texting assistant with a detailed security page on credential isolation and checkout binding, and a public updates page. No outside agent can call it, no price is published, and its privacy policy says nothing on training with user content.

Before you call either

Asmi

  1. Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
  2. Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
  3. Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
  4. Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
  5. Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.

Tab

  1. Don't plan to call Tab from another agent. It answers only the owner's Messages or WhatsApp thread.
  2. Tell the owner that access needs a waitlist place and no price is published.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or Tab?

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Tab's 10.7 (F), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Tab leads on maintenance & community.

Other comparisons with Asmi or Tab

Disclosure

Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Tab competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report