Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
Asmi vs Lindy
Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
Asmi F
Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 30 against 24
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them
Watch for
Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 32 against 20
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 9 against 3
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Asmi | Lindy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 30 | 24 | Asmi +6 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 20 | 32 | Lindy +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 43 | 43 | even |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 49 | 49 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 35 | Lindy +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 3 | 9 | Lindy +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 52 | Lindy +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 33.3/100 | F 32.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Asmi | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Humint Labs, Inc. | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) |
| Hosted endpoint | https://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/ | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth | OAuth |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026). | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published |
| Tools exposed | 12 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | none | 2025-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |
Verdicts
Asmi
Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Before you call either
Asmi
- Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
- Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
- Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
- Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
- Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or Lindy?
Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.
Other comparisons with Asmi or Lindy
- asaply vs Asmi
- asaply vs Lindy
- Asmi vs AstrBot
- Asmi vs Boba
- Asmi vs Boski
- Asmi vs Brea
- Asmi vs Caddy
- Asmi vs CowAgent
- Asmi vs Del
- Asmi vs folk
- Asmi vs GAIA
- Asmi vs Grok Bot
- Asmi vs Haven
- Asmi vs Hermes Agent
- Asmi vs HireAlpha
- Asmi vs Instinct
- Asmi vs IronClaw
- Asmi vs nanobot
- Asmi vs NanoClaw
- Asmi vs Natura tinyNature
- Asmi vs Dots
- Asmi vs OpenClaw
- Asmi vs OpenInstinct
- Asmi vs Orbits
- Asmi vs Orchid
- Asmi vs Pally
- Asmi vs PicoClaw
- Asmi vs Poke
- Asmi vs QwenPaw
- Asmi vs szn
- Asmi vs Tab
- Asmi vs Tomo
- Asmi vs Town
- Asmi vs Zapia
- Asmi vs ZeroClaw
- Asmi vs Zo Computer
- Boba vs Lindy
- Brea vs Lindy
- Del vs Lindy
- HireAlpha vs Lindy
- Lindy vs OpenInstinct
- Lindy vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orchid
- Lindy vs szn
- Lindy vs Tab
- Lindy vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- Boski vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- folk vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Haven vs Lindy
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- Leon vs Lindy
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Town
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- Lindy vs Natura tinyNature
- Lindy vs Pally
- Lindy vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- Asmi vs Gemini Spark
- Asmi vs Leon
- Asmi vs Talorys
- Asmi vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lindy vs Talorys
Disclosure
Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asmi-vs-lindy.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asmi.json·/api/v1/tools/lindy.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asmi lindy(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asmi", "b": "lindy"}at/mcp, no key