Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run

Asmi vs Lindy

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community. Both do assistants reached by message.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Asmi F

Best for An agent that needs phone calls, texts and emails to businesses done for its owner.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 30 against 24

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them

Watch for

Tool JSON Schemas and annotations can't be read before OAuth (unauthenticated initialize returns 401).

Lindy F

Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 32 against 20
  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 9 against 3

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAsmiLindyEdge
Reliability16%203024Asmi +6
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.22032Lindy +12
Agent ergonomics13%16.24343even
Security & auth14%17.54949even
Payments & pricing10%12.53035Lindy +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.839Lindy +6
Transparency & trust7%8.85152Lindy +1
Negative events≤150-3
TotalF 33.3/100F 32.3/100

Facts side by side

FactAsmiLindy
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorHumint Labs, Inc.Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy)
Hosted endpointhttps://prod.asmiai.com/mcp/claude/no (local only)
TransportsStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuthOAuth
PricingFreemiumPaid
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under Asmi's Terms of Service (Humint Labs, Inc., a Delaware corporation, effective October 2026).Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published
Tools exposed12none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last releasenone2025-10-21
Terms last updated2026-09-24
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-28
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes

Verdicts

Asmi

Asmi is a hosted errand service with a 12-tool MCP server for Claude, ChatGPT and Muse, using OAuth with separate scopes for tracking tasks and for contacting people. Tool schemas sit behind sign-in, the outreach scope is ticked by default, and no status page, changelog or security contact was found.

Lindy

Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.

Before you call either

Asmi

  1. Use the endpoint for your own client (/mcp/claude/, /mcp/openai/ or /mcp/meta/). A token from another client gets 403.
  2. Call discover_search before execute_start, then poll execute_status with the task id instead of starting the task again.
  3. Answer Asmi's questions with execute_advance. Calls already placed can't be recalled by execute_cancel.
  4. Expect outreach_not_permitted if the owner unticked contact people. Ask them to reconnect rather than retrying.
  5. Check billing_status before starting a task, since each outreach task uses one of the month's quota.

Lindy

  1. Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
  2. Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
  3. Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
  4. Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
  5. Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Asmi or Lindy?

Asmi scores 33.3 (F) on agent readiness against Lindy's 32.3 (F), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Lindy leads on schema & documentation, payments & pricing and maintenance & community.

Other comparisons with Asmi or Lindy

Disclosure

Asmi competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.