Head to head · Assistants reached by message · October 2026 research run
asaply vs Lindy
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants reached by message.
Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons
Which one, for what
asaply F
Best for People in covered neighbourhoods who want coffee, lunch, tickets and rides handled by text.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Lindy loses 3 points for them
Watch for
No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.
Lindy F
Best for Lindy suits a person or small team that lives in Slack and Google or Microsoft mail and wants briefs, drafts, scheduling and meeting notes done on a schedule.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 24 against 10
- Schema & documentation, 32 against 10
- Agent ergonomics, 43 against 0
- Security & auth, 49 against 0
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 0
- Maintenance & community, 9 against 2
- Transparency & trust, 52 against 43
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
The integrations page says approval settings apply in shared Slack threads only. Web chat, Slack direct messages, iMessage and SMS are not covered, and reads are never covered.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | asaply | Lindy | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 10 | 24 | Lindy +14 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 10 | 32 | Lindy +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 0 | 43 | Lindy +43 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 0 | 49 | Lindy +49 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 0 | 35 | Lindy +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 2 | 9 | Lindy +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 43 | 52 | Lindy +9 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -3 | |
| Total | F 7.6/100 | F 32.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | asaply | Lindy |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Platform | Platform |
| Vendor | Asaply Inc. | Crivello Corp (doing business as Lindy) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth |
| Pricing | Pay per use | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Closed service under asaply's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Messaging Terms (Asaply Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026). | Proprietary service under Lindy's Terms of Service. No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | none | 2025-10-21 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-24 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-28 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes |
Verdicts
asaply
asaply is a text-only errand assistant in early access that orders, books and pays through Apple Pay after showing the total, and can read and change a connected Google Calendar and Gmail. No outside agent can call it, the service fee isn't published, and no status page or security contact was found.
Lindy
Lindy keeps what it remembers in files the owner can read and edit, and publishes credit prices. Its approval setting applies in shared Slack threads only, so writes asked for by direct message, text or web chat run unasked, which its pricing page does not say. It has no status page, and its changelog stops in October 2025.
Before you call either
asaply
- Don't plan to call asaply from another agent. It answers only texts from the owner's phone number and group chats it joins.
- Tell the owner each errand adds an unpublished service fee to the order total.
Lindy
- Treat a request sent by direct message, text or web chat as unguarded. Approval prompts appear in shared Slack threads only.
- Run a routine as a dry run before turning it on. A dry run reads real data and sends, posts and writes nothing.
- Turn off unused tools after adding an MCP server. Every supported tool arrives switched on, and a large server adds more than a hundred.
- Expect a billed seat for anyone who mentions Lindy in Slack. A teammate who joins that way has seven free days first.
- Connect only hosted MCP servers on public HTTPS with streamable HTTP, the one kind the docs describe.
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Lindy?
Lindy scores 32.3 (F) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.
Other comparisons with asaply or Lindy
- asaply vs Asmi
- asaply vs AstrBot
- asaply vs Boba
- asaply vs Boski
- asaply vs Brea
- asaply vs Caddy
- asaply vs CowAgent
- asaply vs Del
- asaply vs folk
- asaply vs GAIA
- asaply vs Grok Bot
- asaply vs Haven
- asaply vs Hermes Agent
- asaply vs HireAlpha
- asaply vs Instinct
- asaply vs IronClaw
- asaply vs nanobot
- asaply vs NanoClaw
- asaply vs Natura tinyNature
- asaply vs Dots
- asaply vs OpenClaw
- asaply vs OpenInstinct
- asaply vs Orbits
- asaply vs Orchid
- asaply vs Pally
- asaply vs PicoClaw
- asaply vs Poke
- asaply vs QwenPaw
- asaply vs szn
- asaply vs Tab
- asaply vs Tomo
- asaply vs Town
- asaply vs Zapia
- asaply vs ZeroClaw
- asaply vs Zo Computer
- Asmi vs Lindy
- Boba vs Lindy
- Brea vs Lindy
- Del vs Lindy
- HireAlpha vs Lindy
- Lindy vs OpenInstinct
- Lindy vs Orbits
- Lindy vs Orchid
- Lindy vs szn
- Lindy vs Tab
- Lindy vs Zapia
- AstrBot vs Lindy
- Boski vs Lindy
- Caddy vs Lindy
- CowAgent vs Lindy
- folk vs Lindy
- GAIA vs Lindy
- Gemini Spark vs Lindy
- Grok Bot vs Lindy
- Haven vs Lindy
- Hermes Agent vs Lindy
- Instinct vs Lindy
- IronClaw vs Lindy
- Leon vs Lindy
- Lindy vs nanobot
- Lindy vs NanoClaw
- Lindy vs Dots
- Lindy vs OpenClaw
- Lindy vs PicoClaw
- Lindy vs Poke
- Lindy vs QwenPaw
- Lindy vs Town
- Lindy vs ZeroClaw
- Lindy vs Zo Computer
- asaply vs Gemini Spark
- asaply vs Leon
- asaply vs Wajo (Fo)
- Lindy vs Natura tinyNature
- Lindy vs Pally
- Lindy vs Tomo
- Lindy vs Wajo (Fo)
- asaply vs Talorys
- Lindy vs Talorys
Disclosure
asaply competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/asaply-vs-lindy.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/asaply.json·/api/v1/tools/lindy.json - From a terminal
anchor compare asaply lindy(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "asaply", "b": "lindy"}at/mcp, no key