Write a review

Head to head · Assistants that remember you · October 2026 research run

asaply vs Atticus

Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistants that remember you.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 875 assistants comparisons

asaplyAsaply Inc. · Platform F7.6/100#1089 of 1094 AtticusSaarthurR (Saarth Ranka) · Platform E42.9/100#974 of 1094

Which one, for what

asaply F

Best for People in covered neighbourhoods who want coffee, lunch, tickets and rides handled by text.

No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint for an outside agent.

Atticus E

Best for A person on macOS 26 with a Claude Pro or Max plan who wants voice control of apps, windows, files and the browser.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 68 against 10
  • Schema & documentation, 15 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 9 against 0
  • Security & auth, 49 against 0
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 0
  • Maintenance & community, 51 against 2
  • Transparency & trust, 56 against 43

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

No API, MCP server or documented command an outside agent can call

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runasaplyAtticusEdge
Reliability16%201068Atticus +58
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.21015Atticus +5
Agent ergonomics13%16.209Atticus +9
Security & auth14%17.5049Atticus +49
Payments & pricing10%12.5060Atticus +60
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8251Atticus +49
Transparency & trust7%8.84356Atticus +13
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 7.6/100E 42.9/100

Facts side by side

FactasaplyAtticus
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorAsaply Inc.SaarthurR (Saarth Ranka)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyNone
PricingPay per useYour plan
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under asaply's Terms of Service, Privacy Policy and Messaging Terms (Asaply Inc., a Delaware corporation, last updated 11 October 2026).MIT
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last releasenone2026-10-14
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularitynone163 stars

Verdicts

asaply

asaply is a text-only errand assistant in early access that orders, books and pays through Apple Pay after showing the total, and can read and change a connected Google Calendar and Gmail. No outside agent can call it, the service fee isn't published, and no status page or security contact was found.

Atticus

Atticus runs a person's Mac by voice on their existing Claude or Devin plan, with a sandboxed safe mode and a local log of every command. It has no API, MCP server or documented command for another agent, it is five days old, and it rebuilds itself from the main branch every six hours by default.

Before you call either

asaply

  1. Don't plan to call asaply from another agent. It answers only texts from the owner's phone number and group chats it joins.
  2. Tell the owner each errand adds an unpublished service fee to the order total.

Atticus

  1. Don't plan to call Atticus from another agent. It takes requests only from its own shortcut and typing box
  2. If a user runs Atticus beside you, expect it to move windows and type into apps on the same Mac
  3. Point a user who wants pinned versions to Settings > About & Updates to turn off self-update

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, asaply or Atticus?

Atticus scores 42.9 (E) on agent readiness against asaply's 7.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are asaply and Atticus open source?

No open-source release is listed for asaply. Atticus is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with asaply or Atticus

Disclosure

asaply competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report