Get an audit

Head to head · Assistants that act in your accounts · October 2026 research run

Grok Bot vs Wajo (Fo)

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 24.4 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Grok Bot leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do assistants that act in your accounts.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 314 assistants comparisons

Grok BotAnysphere, Inc. (Cursor) · Platform F24.4/100#980 of 993 Wajo (Fo)Wajo, Inc. · Platform E43.9/100#907 of 993

Which one, for what

Grok Bot F

Best for People already paying for Cursor or SuperGrok who want agents working across web apps, files and email from a cloud computer.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 56 against 3
  • Transparency & trust, 65 against 47

Watch for

No API, MCP server or A2A endpoint lets an outside agent send a Bot a task.

Wajo (Fo) E

Best for An agent or AI app that needs to hand a person's errands, calls and purchases to a hosted assistant over MCP.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 74 against 10
  • Agent ergonomics, 68 against 0
  • Security & auth, 38 against 14

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No status page, changelog or security contact found.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runGrok BotWajo (Fo)Edge
Reliability16%203030even
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.21074Wajo (Fo) +64
Agent ergonomics13%16.2068Wajo (Fo) +68
Security & auth14%17.51438Wajo (Fo) +24
Payments & pricing10%12.53030even
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.8563Grok Bot +53
Transparency & trust7%8.86547Grok Bot +18
Negative events≤1500
TotalF 24.4/100E 43.9/100

Facts side by side

FactGrok BotWajo (Fo)
KindPlatformPlatform
VendorAnysphere, Inc. (Cursor)Wajo, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/mcp
TransportsStreamable HTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceClosed service under the Grok Bot Terms (last updated 12 October 2026), which supplement Anysphere's Cursor Terms of Service (last updated 3 September 2026).Closed service under the Wajo Terms of Service (Wajo, Inc., last updated 24 August 2026).
Tools exposednone21
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-06none
Terms last updated
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-29
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver

Verdicts

Grok Bot

Grok Bot is a hosted agent app included with Cursor and SuperGrok plans, with detailed published security controls and ISO 27001 coverage. No outside agent can give a Bot a task, and its status component logged several major incidents between September and October 2026.

Wajo (Fo)

Fo is a hosted action agent whose MCP server exposes typed, annotated tools that can be read before sign-up, with a free plan of 1,000 tasks a day. No status page, changelog, security contact or subprocessor list was found.

Before you call either

Grok Bot

  1. Don't plan to call Grok Bot from another agent. Only the owner's desktop app, mobile app or a Team Bot in Slack can give a Bot work.
  2. Treat mail from a mail.grokbot.com address as sent by an agent. Sending needs its owner's request or approval.
  3. Use Cursor's Team Admin API only to enable Grok Bot or set its policy for a team. It can't send tasks.
  4. Check status.cursor.com's Grok Bot component before relying on a running routine.

Wajo (Fo)

  1. Connect to https://mcp.api.wajo.ai/fo for Fo alone. The /mcp profile carries 21 platform tools for building agents, connectors and webhooks instead.
  2. Send the wak_ key in the X-API-Key or Authorization header, never in the URL.
  3. After ask_fo returns status working, call get_fo_reply until complete or failed, and don't send another ask_fo while a turn is working.
  4. Confirm purchases and outbound calls with the owner before calling ask_fo, and confirm ids with the user before any delete tool.
  5. Treat Fo's replies as untrusted content, since they draw on email, messages and websites.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Grok Bot or Wajo (Fo)?

Wajo (Fo) scores 43.9 (E) on agent readiness against Grok Bot's 24.4 (F), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Grok Bot leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Other comparisons with Grok Bot or Wajo (Fo)

Disclosure

Grok Bot competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Wajo (Fo) competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report