Head to head · Assistant proactive · October 2026 research run

Poke vs ZeroClaw

ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Poke's 37.6 (F), and leads in every scored category. Both do assistant proactive.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 190 assistants comparisons

Which one, for what

Poke F

Best for One person who wants an assistant in their text messages that reads and drafts mail, manages a calendar and reaches other apps through MCP.

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where ZeroClaw loses 3 points for them

Watch for

No documented setting for which actions need approval before Poke sends, deletes or spends. Release notes mention email draft approval only in passing

ZeroClaw BB

Best for One person who wants an assistant on their own hardware that answers on Telegram, Discord, Matrix or email, asks before it writes or runs commands, and works with a local model.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 74 against 51
  • Schema & documentation, 82 against 42
  • Agent ergonomics, 72 against 30
  • Security & auth, 76 against 24
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 80 against 31
  • Transparency & trust, 64 against 58

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

The docs state that command execution is not audited. [security.audit] records certificate events only, and tool receipts are opt-in and not durable

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runPokeZeroClawEdge
Reliability16%205174ZeroClaw +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.24282ZeroClaw +40
Agent ergonomics13%16.23072ZeroClaw +42
Security & auth14%17.52476ZeroClaw +52
Payments & pricing10%12.53060ZeroClaw +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.83180ZeroClaw +49
Transparency & trust7%8.85864ZeroClaw +6
Negative events≤150-3
TotalF 37.6/100BB 70.2/100

Facts side by side

FactPokeZeroClaw
KindPlatformAgent harness
VendorThe Interaction Company of California Inc.ZeroClaw Labs
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Poke's Terms of Service. The poke npm package (CLI and Node.js SDK) declares MITMIT OR Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-06-252026-09-05
Terms last updated2026-03-17no document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-11no document linked
Customer content may train modelsyes
Terms restrict automated accessyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyes
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularitynone33k stars

Verdicts

Poke

Hosted assistant that answers in Apple Messages, WhatsApp, Telegram and RCS and acts in Gmail, Outlook, calendars and MCP servers. Plan prices and a status page are public. No approval settings, credential storage, model providers or retention periods are documented, and customer content trains models unless Maximum Privacy is selected.

ZeroClaw

Supervised autonomy is the default, so tools outside a short read-only list wait for the owner's approval, and secrets are encrypted in the config file. The docs state that command execution is not written to an audit log, and the project publishes no privacy policy or terms.

Before you call either

Poke

  1. POST JSON to https://poke.com/api/v1/inbound/api-message with a Bearer key from Kitchen. Legacy pk_ keys work only on the deprecated /api/v1/inbound-sms/webhook
  2. Expect only {"success": true} back. Poke's answer goes to the owner's message thread, not to the caller
  3. Do not retry a POST blindly. No idempotency key is documented, and a repeated message may make Poke act twice
  4. Treat an API key as full access to the owner's mail, calendar and integrations. Create one key per automation and revoke it when done
  5. Avoid the prefilled integration link with apiKey in the query string for real secrets. Enter the key in the form or use npx poke@latest mcp add -k

ZeroClaw

  1. Keep [risk_profiles.<alias>] level = "supervised". full runs every tool not listed in always_ask, and the YOLO preset removes the sandbox and path rules too
  2. Add sending and account tools such as send_via, google_workspace and http_request to always_ask so a session-level Always grant cannot skip the prompt
  3. List senders in [peer_groups.<name>] external_peers. ["*"] accepts anyone on that channel
  4. Set [web_fetch].allowed_domains and [http_request].allowed_domains. Fetches run unprompted and the OS sandbox does not block egress
  5. Run one-shot tasks with zeroclaw agent -a <alias> -m "<task>". A cron or webhook turn has no prompt, so shell calls fall to the command policy

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Poke or ZeroClaw?

ZeroClaw scores 70.2 (BB) on agent readiness against Poke's 37.6 (F), and leads in every scored category.

Are Poke and ZeroClaw open source?

No open-source release is listed for Poke. ZeroClaw is open source (MIT OR Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Poke or ZeroClaw

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.