Get an audit

Head to head · Proactive personal assistants · October 2026 research run

CowAgent vs Town

CowAgent scores 58.5 (C) on agent readiness against Town's 48.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Town leads on security & auth and transparency & trust. Both do proactive personal assistants.

Best AI personal assistants that act for one person · All 834 assistants comparisons

CowAgentzhayujie · Agent harness C58.5/100#592 of 1010 TownTown.com, Inc. · Platform D48.7/100#834 of 1010

Which one, for what

CowAgent C

Best for One technical owner who wants an assistant on WeChat, Feishu, DingTalk, Telegram, Slack or Discord with memory in local files and a choice of Chinese and Western model providers.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 84 against 35
  • Schema & documentation, 67 against 33
  • Agent ergonomics, 59 against 49
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
  • Maintenance & community, 83 against 60

Also in its favour

  • Open source

Watch for

Source and Docker installs default to full-access, and no mode asks the owner before a shell command, a file send or an MCP call

Town D

Best for An owner who wants a mail and calendar assistant whose routines other systems can trigger.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 79 against 43
  • Transparency & trust, 63 against 45

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where CowAgent loses 5 points for them

Watch for

The privacy policy describes training with an opt-out and the trust page says training is opt-in.

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runCowAgentTownEdge
Reliability16%208435CowAgent +49
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26733CowAgent +34
Agent ergonomics13%16.25949CowAgent +10
Security & auth14%17.54379Town +36
Payments & pricing10%12.56030CowAgent +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88360CowAgent +23
Transparency & trust7%8.84563Town +18
Negative events≤15-50
TotalC 58.5/100D 48.7/100

Facts side by side

FactCowAgentTown
KindAgent harnessPlatform
VendorzhayujieTown.com, Inc.
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITClosed service under Town's Terms of Service (Town.com, Inc., updated 21 July 2026).
Read-only variant documentedyesyes
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-302026-10-10
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity47k starsnone

Verdicts

CowAgent

MIT software with seven releases in 90 days, memory kept as plain files in the owner's workspace and three per-session permission modes. Source and Docker installs default to full-access, no action asks for approval, and an open report of 31 July 2026 says group members could reach the owner's files through the bot.

Town

Town is a hosted assistant that works across the owner's mail, calendar and work apps, and other systems can start its routines through per-routine webhooks with rotatable secrets, idempotency keys and documented errors. A caller can't read a run's result. The privacy policy and trust page disagree on whether training is on by default.

Before you call either

CowAgent

  1. Set agent_permission_mode to workspace-write or read-only before connecting any channel. Source and Docker installs default to full-access
  2. Keep the bot out of group chats that include other people. Any member who mentions it reaches the same tools as the owner
  3. Set web_password before changing web_host to 0.0.0.0. The password is empty by default
  4. Set external_api_token to enable POST /v1/chat/completions, and send conversation_id to keep one session. The model field does not select a model
  5. Run it in a container for a hard boundary. The docs and the source both say the permission modes are not isolation

Town

  1. Start a Town routine with POST to its webhook URL, Authorization Bearer whsec_ secret, and application/json or text/plain. Expect 202 only.
  2. Send X-Town-Idempotency-Key with a stable event id on every retry so Town doesn't start a second run.
  3. Treat 404 as wrong secret, disabled endpoint or missing endpoint alike, and ask the owner to check Routine Settings rather than retrying.
  4. Send account_email only if the owner allowed the override. It must match a connected account in full and can't widen the routine's scope.
  5. Ask the owner to keep routines that act on webhook input in approval-required mode, as Town's own docs advise.

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, CowAgent or Town?

CowAgent scores 58.5 (C) on agent readiness against Town's 48.7 (D), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Town leads on security & auth and transparency & trust.

Are CowAgent and Town open source?

CowAgent is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Town.

Other comparisons with CowAgent or Town

Disclosure

Town competes with LocalGhost, which Anchor Terminal's founder builds. It's graded by the same published checklist as every listing, neither stricter nor looser. Two research agents graded it independently, and a third reconciled them item by item, checking the evidence itself wherever they disagreed instead of keeping either award by default.

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.

Get an auditSee a sample report