Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Crush
Amp and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 57.1 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 52
- Security & auth, 57 against 44
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 56
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 54 against 31
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 35
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Crush | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 54 | Crush +23 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 65 | Amp +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 52 | Amp +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 44 | Amp +13 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 55 | Crush +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 82 | Crush +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 56 | Amp +21 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | C 56.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Crush |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Charm |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Crush?
Amp and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 57.1 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Other comparisons with Amp or Crush
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Crush
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Cline vs Crush
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-crush.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/crush.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp crush(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "crush"}at/mcp, no key