Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Amp vs Crush

Amp and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 57.1 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Amp C

Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 72 against 65
  • Agent ergonomics, 69 against 52
  • Security & auth, 57 against 44
  • Transparency & trust, 77 against 56

Watch for

The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin

Crush C

Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 54 against 31
  • Payments & pricing, 55 against 35

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAmpCrushEdge
Reliability16%203154Crush +23
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27265Amp +7
Agent ergonomics13%16.26952Amp +17
Security & auth14%17.55744Amp +13
Payments & pricing10%12.53555Crush +20
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87982Crush +3
Transparency & trust7%8.87756Amp +21
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 57.1/100C 56.5/100

Facts side by side

FactAmpCrush
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAmp Frontier CorporationCharm
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is privateFSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-082026-10-09
Terms last updatedno date givenno document linked
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-10no document linked
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity41k npm/wk29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Amp

Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.

Crush

Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.

Before you call either

Amp

  1. Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
  2. Set AMP_API_KEY to an access token starting sgamp_ from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token that amp login stores
  3. Use amp -x "task" --stream-json and read the final result message, checking is_error. Exit codes are not documented
  4. Set AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1 or amp.updates.mode to disabled in CI. Updates install automatically by default
  5. Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown

Crush

  1. Add permissions deny rules or a PreToolUse hook before crush run. It approves every permission request in its session
  2. Read .crushrc, crushrc and crush.json in a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup
  3. Set CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land
  4. Wrap crush run in your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag
  5. Configure a provider by environment variable or crushrc first. With none, crush run exits with an error asking for interactive setup

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Crush?

Amp and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 57.1 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on reliability and payments & pricing.

Other comparisons with Amp or Crush

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.