Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Auggie CLI vs Crush
Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Auggie CLI leads on agent ergonomics. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams already paying for Augment who want its Context Engine in a terminal, in CI or through ACP and MCP, with permission rules a security team can delegate to a webhook.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 65 against 52
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 2.8 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
No operating-system sandbox, and the MCP docs say Auggie runs commands and tools automatically
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 54 against 43
- Payments & pricing, 55 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 58
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Auggie CLI | Crush | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 43 | 54 | Crush +11 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 67 | 65 | Auggie CLI +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 52 | Auggie CLI +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 44 | Auggie CLI +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 55 | Crush +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 82 | Crush +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 56 | Auggie CLI +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.8/100 | C 56.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Auggie CLI | Crush |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Harness (formerly Augment Code) | Charm |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. The licence from Augment Computing, Inc. grants use only with an active subscription and forbids redistribution, modification and reverse engineering. The GitHub repository holds the README, changelog, examples and issue tracker, not the source | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-08-21 | 2026-10-09 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 16k npm/wk | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Auggie CLI
Print mode has turn caps, JSON output and resumable sessions, and permission rules resolve to the most restrictive across sources. Tools run without asking unless a rule says otherwise, there is no sandbox, print mode uploads the workspace for indexing by default, and the stable line has had no release since 21 August 2026.
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
Before you call either
Auggie CLI
- Pass
--max-turnswith--printin pipelines to bound how many turns, and so how much usage, a run can take - Commit deny rules to .augment/settings.json before an unattended run. Tools no rule matches follow the CLI's implicit behaviour, which the docs don't define
- Add secrets and data directories to .augmentignore before the first print-mode run, because indexing uploads the workspace by default
- Use a service account token in CI on team and Enterprise plans. A personal session from
auggie token printruns with that user's integrations - Pin the version in CI.
latestis 0.x, whilepreviewanddaemoncarry 1.x prereleases whose permission rules ignore some legacy tool names
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Auggie CLI or Crush?
Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Auggie CLI leads on agent ergonomics.
Other comparisons with Auggie CLI or Crush
- Agent Zero vs Auggie CLI
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Aider vs Auggie CLI
- Aider vs Crush
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs Auggie CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Claude Code
- Auggie CLI vs Cline
- Auggie CLI vs Cursor CLI
- Auggie CLI vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Auggie CLI vs Devin
- Auggie CLI vs Droid CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Pi
- Auggie CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Auggie CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Auggie CLI vs goose
- Auggie CLI vs Harness²
- Auggie CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Junie CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Auggie CLI vs OpenCode
- Auggie CLI vs OpenHands
- Auggie CLI vs Prime Agent
- Auggie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Cline vs Crush
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Auggie CLI vs CLI Manager
- Auggie CLI vs Harness
- Auggie CLI vs Paperclip
- Auggie CLI vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/auggie-vs-crush.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/auggie.json·/api/v1/tools/crush.json - From a terminal
anchor compare auggie crush(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "auggie", "b": "crush"}at/mcp, no key