Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Crush vs OpenHands
OpenHands scores 70.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- No incidents deducted, where OpenHands loses 5 points for them
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
OpenHands BB
Best for Teams that want to self-host a coding agent with a web UI, per-conversation Docker sandboxes and scheduled or webhook automations, or embed the agent through a Python SDK and REST API.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 83 against 54
- Schema & documentation, 87 against 65
- Agent ergonomics, 78 against 52
- Security & auth, 66 against 44
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 55
- Transparency & trust, 67 against 56
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Open source
Watch for
Confirmation mode is off by default in Agent Canvas, and the npm install gives the agent the host's whole filesystem
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crush | OpenHands | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 83 | OpenHands +29 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 87 | OpenHands +22 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 52 | 78 | OpenHands +26 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 66 | OpenHands +22 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 60 | OpenHands +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 85 | OpenHands +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 67 | OpenHands +11 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | C 56.5/100 | BB 70.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crush | OpenHands |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Charm | All Hands AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | MIT (Agent Canvas, SDK, tools and Agent Server). OpenHands Cloud is a hosted service |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2025-09-03 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 90k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 2.5/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
OpenHands
A Docker container per conversation with OH_CONVERSATION_RUNTIME=docker, each with its own Agent Server. Confirmation mode is off by default in Agent Canvas, and the npm install gives the agent the host's whole filesystem.
Before you call either
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
OpenHands
- Set
AGENT_CANVAS_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1andDO_NOT_TRACK=1before the first start - Start Canvas with
OH_CONVERSATION_RUNTIME=dockeror use the Docker image. The npm install runs the agent on the host - Turn on confirmation mode with a risk threshold. Canvas starts with it off
- Use the SDK or the Agent Server API for headless runs. The
openhands --headlessCLI is no longer maintained - Set
filter_tools_regexon the agent to keep unneeded MCP tool definitions out of the context
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crush or OpenHands?
OpenHands scores 70.8 (BB) on agent readiness against Crush's 56.5 (C), and leads in every scored category.
Are Crush and OpenHands open source?
No open-source release is listed for Crush. OpenHands is open source (MIT (Agent Canvas, SDK, tools and Agent Server). OpenHands Cloud is a hosted service).
Other comparisons with Crush or OpenHands
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Agent Zero vs OpenHands
- Aider vs Crush
- Aider vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenHands
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs OpenHands
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Claude Code vs OpenHands
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Cursor CLI vs OpenHands
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenHands
- Devin vs OpenHands
- Droid CLI vs OpenHands
- Pi vs OpenHands
- Gemini CLI vs OpenHands
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenHands
- goose vs OpenHands
- Harness² vs OpenHands
- HarnessRouter vs OpenHands
- Jules vs OpenHands
- Junie CLI vs OpenHands
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kiro CLI vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenHands
- Muse Code vs OpenHands
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenHands vs Prime Agent
- OpenHands vs Qoder CLI
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Mirror CLI
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- CLI Manager vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
- Harness vs OpenHands
- OpenHands vs Paperclip
- OpenHands vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crush-vs-openhands.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crush.json·/api/v1/tools/openhands.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crush openhands(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crush", "b": "openhands"}at/mcp, no key