Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Agent Zero vs Crush

Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against Agent Zero's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Agent Zero leads on agent ergonomics, security & auth and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Agent Zero C

Best for A technical owner who wants an agent with its own Linux machine, reachable from Telegram, WhatsApp or email, with scheduled tasks and editable memory.

Ahead on

  • Agent ergonomics, 62 against 52
  • Security & auth, 54 against 44
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 55

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Open source

Watch for

No approval step before shell commands, file changes or outgoing messages. Tool Access defaults to allow

Crush C

Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.

Ahead on

  • Maintenance & community, 82 against 75

Also in its favour

  • Free to start without a card
  • No incidents deducted, where Agent Zero loses 6 points for them

Watch for

crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAgent ZeroCrushEdge
Reliability16%205754Agent Zero +3
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.26465Crush +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.26252Agent Zero +10
Security & auth14%17.55444Agent Zero +10
Payments & pricing10%12.56055Agent Zero +5
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87582Crush +7
Transparency & trust7%8.85556Crush +1
Negative events≤15-60
TotalC 54.2/100C 56.5/100

Facts side by side

FactAgent ZeroCrush
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAgent Zero, s.r.o.Charm
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceMITFSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available)
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-09-232026-10-09
Terms last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity19k stars29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Agent Zero

Self-hosted under the MIT licence, with nine releases in the 90 days to 12 October 2026 and breaking changes listed in the release notes. The agent runs shell commands in its container with no approval step, the web interface has no login by default, and five CVEs from the past year have no published GitHub advisory.

Crush

Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.

Before you call either

Agent Zero

  1. Set a UI login and password in Settings before publishing the port or opening a tunnel. The default has none
  2. Fill allowed_users, allowed_numbers or sender_whitelist before enabling a channel. An empty list accepts every sender
  3. Enable the Infection Check plugin when the agent reads mail, web pages or MCP results. It ships disabled
  4. Run v2.12 or later. It fixes a Telegram webhook authentication bypass and a WhatsApp media path traversal
  5. Call POST /api_message with the X-API-KEY header. The token changes when the UI login or password changes

Crush

  1. Add permissions deny rules or a PreToolUse hook before crush run. It approves every permission request in its session
  2. Read .crushrc, crushrc and crush.json in a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup
  3. Set CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1 or DO_NOT_TRACK=1 to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land
  4. Wrap crush run in your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag
  5. Configure a provider by environment variable or crushrc first. With none, crush run exits with an error asking for interactive setup

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Agent Zero or Crush?

Crush scores 56.5 (C) on agent readiness against Agent Zero's 54.2 (C), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. Agent Zero leads on agent ergonomics, security & auth and payments & pricing.

Are Agent Zero and Crush open source?

Agent Zero is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Crush.

Other comparisons with Agent Zero or Crush

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.