Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Crush vs mini-swe-agent
mini-swe-agent and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 56.7 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Crush C
Best for Developers who want a Go terminal agent with a wide provider list, local models and Claude Code-compatible hooks.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 65 against 58
- Maintenance & community, 82 against 49
- Transparency & trust, 56 against 51
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where mini-swe-agent loses 4 points for them
Watch for
crush run approves every permission request automatically, which the README doesn't mention
Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 54
- Agent ergonomics, 69 against 52
- Security & auth, 56 against 44
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 55
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.3 out of 5
Watch for
The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Crush | mini-swe-agent | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 54 | 70 | mini-swe-agent +16 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 65 | 58 | Crush +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 52 | 69 | mini-swe-agent +17 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 44 | 56 | mini-swe-agent +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 55 | 60 | mini-swe-agent +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 82 | 49 | Crush +33 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 51 | Crush +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | C 56.5/100 | C 56.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Crush | mini-swe-agent |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Charm | SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | FSL-1.1-MIT (source-available, each release converts to MIT two years after it is made available) | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-09 | 2026-07-23 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 29k stars, 5.6k npm/wk | 8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.3/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Crush
Works with almost any provider or a local model and needs no Charm account. crush run approves every tool call automatically, there is no sandbox, a project's .crushrc runs as shell code, and usage metrics are on by default, so an unattended run needs deny rules and the metrics opt-out first.
mini-swe-agent
A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.
Before you call either
Crush
- Add
permissions denyrules or a PreToolUse hook beforecrush run. It approves every permission request in its session - Read
.crushrc,crushrcandcrush.jsonin a cloned repository before running Crush there. They execute as shell code at startup - Set
CRUSH_DISABLE_METRICS=1orDO_NOT_TRACK=1to stop usage metrics to data.charm.land - Wrap
crush runin your own timeout. It has no turn, time or cost limit flag - Configure a provider by environment variable or
crushrcfirst. With none,crush runexits with an error asking for interactive setup
mini-swe-agent
- Run with
-y --exit-immediatelyfor unattended use. Without--exit-immediatelyit waits for input when the agent finishes - Set
MSWEA_CONFIGURED=trueandMSWEA_MODEL_NAMEfirst, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt - Read
info.exit_statusin the-otrajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally - For untrusted repositories use
-c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables - Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Crush or mini-swe-agent?
mini-swe-agent and Crush score within a point of each other on agent readiness, 56.7 (C) and 56.5 (C). Crush leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Are Crush and mini-swe-agent open source?
No open-source release is listed for Crush. mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Crush or mini-swe-agent
- Agent Zero vs Crush
- Agent Zero vs mini-swe-agent
- Aider vs Crush
- Aider vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Crush
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Claude Code vs Crush
- Claude Code vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Cursor CLI
- Crush vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Crush vs Devin
- Crush vs Droid CLI
- Crush vs Pi
- Crush vs Gemini CLI
- Crush vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Crush vs goose
- Crush vs Harness²
- Crush vs HarnessRouter
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Junie CLI
- Crush vs Kilo Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kiro CLI
- Crush vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenAI Codex
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenHands
- Crush vs Prime Agent
- Crush vs Qoder CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Mirror CLI
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Cursor CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Gemini CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Junie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kilo Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kiro CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Codex
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs Prime Agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mirror CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- Crush vs Harness
- Crush vs Paperclip
- Crush vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/crush-vs-mini-swe-agent.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/crush.json·/api/v1/tools/mini-swe-agent.json - From a terminal
anchor compare crush mini-swe-agent(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "crush", "b": "mini-swe-agent"}at/mcp, no key