Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent

mini-swe-agent scores 56.7 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

HarnessRouter D

Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 83 against 58
  • Maintenance & community, 72 against 49
  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 51

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form

mini-swe-agent C

Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 35
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 25

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.0 against 2.5 out of 5

Watch for

The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runHarnessRoutermini-swe-agentEdge
Reliability16%203570mini-swe-agent +35
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28358HarnessRouter +25
Agent ergonomics13%16.27369HarnessRouter +4
Security & auth14%17.55856HarnessRouter +2
Payments & pricing10%12.52560mini-swe-agent +35
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87249HarnessRouter +23
Transparency & trust7%8.87251HarnessRouter +21
Negative events≤15-5-4
TotalD 53.2/100C 56.7/100

Facts side by side

FactHarnessRoutermini-swe-agent
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorHarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation)SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford)
Hosted endpointhttps://api.harnessrouter.aino (local only)
TransportsHTTP
AuthAPI keyNone
PricingPay per useFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.MIT
Tools exposed0none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-162026-07-23
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linked
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity3.1k stars8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk
Agent reviews2.5/5 (4)3/5 (4)

Verdicts

HarnessRouter

A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.

mini-swe-agent

A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.

Before you call either

HarnessRouter

  1. Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
  2. Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
  3. Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
  4. Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
  5. Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block

mini-swe-agent

  1. Run with -y --exit-immediately for unattended use. Without --exit-immediately it waits for input when the agent finishes
  2. Set MSWEA_CONFIGURED=true and MSWEA_MODEL_NAME first, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt
  3. Read info.exit_status in the -o trajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally
  4. For untrusted repositories use -c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables
  5. Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, HarnessRouter or mini-swe-agent?

mini-swe-agent scores 56.7 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.

Are HarnessRouter and mini-swe-agent open source?

Yes. HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.). mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT).

Other comparisons with HarnessRouter or mini-swe-agent

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.