Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs HarnessRouter
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 331 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 25
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 72
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 72
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where HarnessRouter loses 5 points for them
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 83 against 72
Also in its favour
- A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
- Open source
Watch for
No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | HarnessRouter | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 35 | HarnessRouter +4 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 83 | HarnessRouter +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 73 | HarnessRouter +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 58 | HarnessRouter +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 25 | Amp +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 72 | Amp +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 72 | Amp +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -5 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | D 53.2/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | HarnessRouter |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | HarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | https://api.harnessrouter.ai |
| Transports | HTTP | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Pay per use |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides. |
| Tools exposed | none | 0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 3.1k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.5/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
HarnessRouter
A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
HarnessRouter
- Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
- Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
- Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
- Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
- Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or HarnessRouter?
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation.
Are Amp and HarnessRouter open source?
No open-source release is listed for Amp. HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.).
Other comparisons with Amp or HarnessRouter
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs HarnessRouter
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Claude Code vs HarnessRouter
- Cline vs HarnessRouter
- Cursor CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Devin vs HarnessRouter
- Droid CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Pi vs HarnessRouter
- Gemini CLI vs HarnessRouter
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs HarnessRouter
- goose vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Kilo Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kiro CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs OpenAI Codex
- HarnessRouter vs OpenCode
- HarnessRouter vs OpenHands
- HarnessRouter vs Prime Agent
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs HarnessRouter
- Harness vs HarnessRouter
- HarnessRouter vs Paperclip
- HarnessRouter vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-harnessrouter.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/harnessrouter.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp harnessrouter(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "harnessrouter"}at/mcp, no key