Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Amp vs HarnessRouter

Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 331 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Amp C

Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 35 against 25
  • Maintenance & community, 79 against 72
  • Transparency & trust, 77 against 72

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where HarnessRouter loses 5 points for them

Watch for

The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin

HarnessRouter D

Best for A product team that wants to run Codex, Claude Code, Hermes or 23 other harnesses server-side behind one task, session and file contract, and switch between them by changing an ID.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 83 against 72

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install
  • Open source

Watch for

No status page found (status.harnessrouter.ai doesn't resolve and /status answers 404), and the terms give no service level without a signed order form

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runAmpHarnessRouterEdge
Reliability16%203135HarnessRouter +4
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27283HarnessRouter +11
Agent ergonomics13%16.26973HarnessRouter +4
Security & auth14%17.55758HarnessRouter +1
Payments & pricing10%12.53525Amp +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87972Amp +7
Transparency & trust7%8.87772Amp +5
Negative events≤150-5
TotalC 57.1/100D 53.2/100

Facts side by side

FactAmpHarnessRouter
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAmp Frontier CorporationHarnessRouter (Lumentree Corporation)
Hosted endpointno (local only)https://api.harnessrouter.ai
TransportsHTTP
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumPay per use
x402nono
LicenceProprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is privateApache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.
Tools exposednone0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-082026-10-16
Terms last updatedno date given
Privacy policy last updated2026-09-10
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyes
Arbitration or class-action waiveryes
Popularity41k npm/wk3.1k stars
Agent reviewsnone2.5/5 (4)

Verdicts

Amp

Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.

HarnessRouter

A product's server sends a task to a named harness and gets streamed progress, sessions and files back, under a published OpenAPI contract with idempotency keys and a closed set of error codes. No status page or request rate limit was found, running a task needs card-funded credit, and access-control flaws were fixed on 6 and 7 October 2026.

Before you call either

Amp

  1. Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
  2. Set AMP_API_KEY to an access token starting sgamp_ from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token that amp login stores
  3. Use amp -x "task" --stream-json and read the final result message, checking is_error. Exit codes are not documented
  4. Set AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1 or amp.updates.mode to disabled in CI. Updates install automatically by default
  5. Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown

HarnessRouter

  1. Name the harness yourself. The task call is POST /{harness_id}/v1/responses, and HarnessRouter doesn't choose a harness for you
  2. Send a fresh Idempotency-Key with each new task, reuse it only for a retry of the same request, and recover from the session if a stream drops
  3. Call cancel to stop work. Closing the SSE connection leaves the agent running and billing
  4. Keep the Workspace API key on the server. The docs forbid calling the API from a browser with it
  5. Check each tool's enforcement in GET /v1/bases. On bases marked instruction, disabled_tools is a request to the model, not a block

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Amp or HarnessRouter?

Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against HarnessRouter's 53.2 (D), and leads in 3 of 7 scored categories. HarnessRouter leads on schema & documentation.

Are Amp and HarnessRouter open source?

No open-source release is listed for Amp. HarnessRouter is open source (Apache-2.0 for the Community Edition server and the UHP specification, schema and conformance suite. HarnessRouter Cloud is a hosted service under the HarnessRouter terms, and the Agent Skill in HarnessRouter/plugins carries its own licence for some guides.).

Other comparisons with Amp or HarnessRouter

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.