Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs OpenMausBot
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 59
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 31
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 72
- Agent ergonomics, 77 against 69
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 35
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | OpenMausBot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 60 | OpenMausBot +29 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 90 | OpenMausBot +18 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 77 | OpenMausBot +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 59 | OpenMausBot +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 50 | OpenMausBot +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 74 | Amp +5 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 59 | Amp +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | B 65.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or OpenMausBot?
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Are Amp and OpenMausBot open source?
No open-source release is listed for Amp. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Amp or OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs MiniMax Code
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Unstoppable
- Amp vs Vibe-Trading
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs OpenMausBot
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-openmausbot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp openmausbot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "openmausbot"}at/mcp, no key