Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run
OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.6 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. OpenMausBot leads on security & auth. Both do multi-agent orchestration.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 59 against 53
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 60
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 77
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 65 against 59
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenMausBot | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 60 | 69 | Qwen Code +9 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 90 | 91 | Qwen Code +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 77 | 85 | Qwen Code +8 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 59 | 53 | OpenMausBot +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 60 | Qwen Code +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 74 | 88 | Qwen Code +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 59 | 65 | Qwen Code +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | B 65.4/100 | BB 72.6/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenMausBot | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Supamaus Software Private Limited | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | 20 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-30 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-10 | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-18 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, OpenMausBot or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.6 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. OpenMausBot leads on security & auth.
Are OpenMausBot and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with OpenMausBot or Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Unstoppable
- Qwen Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/openmausbot-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare openmausbot qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "openmausbot", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key