Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run

OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code

Qwen Code scores 72.6 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. OpenMausBot leads on security & auth. Both do multi-agent orchestration.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

OpenMausBot B

Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 59 against 53

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card

Qwen Code BB

Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 69 against 60
  • Agent ergonomics, 85 against 77
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
  • Maintenance & community, 88 against 74
  • Transparency & trust, 65 against 59

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better

Watch for

The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runOpenMausBotQwen CodeEdge
Reliability16%206069Qwen Code +9
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29091Qwen Code +1
Agent ergonomics13%16.27785Qwen Code +8
Security & auth14%17.55953OpenMausBot +6
Payments & pricing10%12.55060Qwen Code +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87488Qwen Code +14
Transparency & trust7%8.85965Qwen Code +6
Negative events≤15-20
TotalB 65.4/100BB 72.6/100

Facts side by side

FactOpenMausBotQwen Code
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorSupamaus Software Private LimitedAlibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transportsstdio
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Tools exposed20none
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-10-302026-10-05
Terms last updated2026-10-102026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-182026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the textnot found in the text
Popularity8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk28k stars, 105k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

OpenMausBot

A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.

Qwen Code

Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.

Before you call either

OpenMausBot

  1. Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at POST /api/auth/pair, and set OPENMAUSBOT_TOKEN with an explicit OMB_PORT
  2. Pass a send_id with every send_bot_message and send_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt
  3. Use wait_for_conversation instead of polling, and on needs-user stop and tell the owner a card is waiting
  4. Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
  5. Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine

Qwen Code

  1. Pass --approval-mode on every run. The settings default is auto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either
  2. Add --max-session-turns, --max-wall-time and --max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget
  3. --yolo doesn't turn on a sandbox. Add --sandbox, or on Linux set tools.executionSandbox with network set to closed
  4. Set QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=false to stop usage statistics
  5. Authenticate with OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_MODEL in CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, OpenMausBot or Qwen Code?

Qwen Code scores 72.6 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. OpenMausBot leads on security & auth.

Are OpenMausBot and Qwen Code open source?

Yes. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with OpenMausBot or Qwen Code

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.