Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
goose vs Qwen Code
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen Code's 72.4 (BB), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Qwen Code leads on schema & documentation. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
goose BB
Good for People and pipelines that want one agent across many model providers or local models, with recipes for repeatable jobs and a desktop app for non-engineers.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 77 against 69
- Security & auth, 77 against 53
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default
Qwen Code BB
Good for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 81
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | goose | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 77 | 69 | goose +8 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 91 | Qwen Code +10 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 85 | Qwen Code +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 77 | 53 | goose +24 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 88 | Qwen Code +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 63 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | 73.9 · BB | 72.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | goose | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 55k stars | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
goose
Telemetry off until the user opts in, with the collected fields listed. Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
goose
- Set
GOOSE_MODE=smart_approveorapprovebefore a run. The default approves everything - Pass
--max-turnswith a real limit. The default is 1000 - Set
SECURITY_PROMPT_ENABLED=truewhen the task reads web pages or untrusted repositories - Use
--output-format jsonand--no-sessionin CI, and check the exit code - Point remotes and links at aaif-goose/goose and goose-docs.ai. The block/goose paths redirect
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, goose or Qwen Code?
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Qwen Code's 72.4 (BB), and leads in 2 of 7 scored categories. Qwen Code leads on schema & documentation.
Are goose and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. goose is open source (Apache-2.0). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with goose or Qwen Code
- Aider vs goose
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs goose
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs goose
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs goose
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- goose vs Prime Agent
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Paperclip
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/goose-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/goose.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare goose qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "goose", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key