Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
OpenCode vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenCode's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. OpenCode leads on security & auth. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
OpenCode B
Good for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 60 against 53
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox
Qwen Code BB
Good for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 79
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 81
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where OpenCode loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenCode | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 69 | Qwen Code +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 91 | Qwen Code +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 85 | Qwen Code +6 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 53 | OpenCode +7 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 88 | Qwen Code +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 63 | OpenCode +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | 67.7 · B | 72.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenCode | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Anomaly | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-30 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-15 | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-03-06 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 211k stars | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, OpenCode or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against OpenCode's 67.7 (B), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. OpenCode leads on security & auth.
Are OpenCode and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. OpenCode is open source (MIT). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with OpenCode or Qwen Code
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs OpenCode
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs OpenCode
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs Prime Agent
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Paperclip
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/opencode-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/opencode.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare opencode qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "opencode", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key