Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Kiro CLI vs OpenCode
OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Kiro CLI's 59.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Kiro CLI leads on security & auth. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Kiro CLI C
Good for Teams on AWS that want one agent configuration across terminal, IDE and web, with central permission policy, prompt logging to their own S3 bucket and IAM Identity Centre sign-in.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 66 against 60
Watch for
Free and individual paid accounts have content used for service improvement, including model training, unless they opt out
OpenCode B
Good for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 57
- Schema & documentation, 88 against 79
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 67
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 40
- Maintenance & community, 81 against 73
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kiro CLI | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 57 | 68 | OpenCode +11 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 79 | 88 | OpenCode +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 79 | OpenCode +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 66 | 60 | Kiro CLI +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 60 | OpenCode +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 73 | 81 | OpenCode +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 67 | 67 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -4 | |
| Total | 59.9 · C | 67.7 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kiro CLI | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amazon Web Services | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. Licensed as AWS Content under the AWS Customer Agreement and the AWS Intellectual Property Licence (https://kiro.dev/license/). The GitHub repository is the public issue tracker and doesn't hold the source | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-05 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-14 | 2026-08-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-05-18 | 2026-03-06 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 4.4k stars | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Kiro CLI
Permission rules follow deny over ask over allow, cloned repositories can't add rules, and a headless session treats every ask as a deny. Content from Free and individual paid accounts is used for service improvement, including model training, unless the user opts out, and API keys for pipelines need a paid plan.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
Kiro CLI
- Set
KIRO_API_KEYand pass--no-interactivewith--trust-tools=<list>in pipelines. Keep--trust-all-toolsfor disposable environments - Pass
--require-mcp-startupwhen a run depends on MCP tools. Without it a failed server is logged and the run continues - Pass
--no-interactivewhenever input is piped from a source you don't control, and run 2.10.0 or later on Windows - Run
kiro-cli settings telemetry.enabled falseand turn off content collection on Free and individual plans. Both are on by default - Export variables in the shell before starting. Since 2.24.0 a project
.envfile is no longer loaded into sessions, MCP servers or tools
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kiro CLI or OpenCode?
OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against Kiro CLI's 59.9 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Kiro CLI leads on security & auth.
Are Kiro CLI and OpenCode open source?
No open-source release is listed for Kiro CLI. OpenCode is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Kiro CLI or OpenCode
- Aider vs Kiro CLI
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs Kiro CLI
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs Kiro CLI
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Devin vs Kiro CLI
- Devin vs OpenCode
- Pi vs Kiro CLI
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kiro CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs OpenCode
- Kiro CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kiro CLI vs OpenHands
- Kiro CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs Prime Agent
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs Paperclip
- OpenCode vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kiro-cli-vs-opencode.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kiro-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/opencode.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kiro-cli opencode(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kiro-cli", "b": "opencode"}at/mcp, no key