Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
OpenCode has a score of 68 (B) against GitHub Copilot CLI's 57.9 (C). Both do agent harness. The largest gap is payments & pricing, 20 points.
Which one, for what
Pick GitHub Copilot CLI for
No category where it leads by five points or more.
Pick OpenCode for
- reliability (+13)
- schema & documentation (+16)
- agent ergonomics (+7)
- payments & pricing (+20)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | GitHub Copilot CLI | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 55 | 68 | OpenCode +13 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 88 | OpenCode +16 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 72 | 79 | OpenCode +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 40 | 60 | OpenCode +20 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 77 | 81 | OpenCode +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 72 | 71 | GitHub Copilot CLI +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -5 | -4 | |
| Total | 57.9 · C | 68 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | GitHub Copilot CLI | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | GitHub | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the licence in the repository's LICENSE.md. Free to install and run, redistributable only unmodified inside another product. The repository holds the README, changelog and install script, not the source | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 11k stars | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
GitHub Copilot CLI
Asks before the first use of each modifying tool, and --deny-tool beats --allow-all-tools and --allow-tool. Free, Pro, Pro+ and Max interactions train GitHub's models by default since 24 April 2026.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
GitHub Copilot CLI
- Pass
--deny-toolfor anything destructive. It wins over--allow-all-toolsand--allow-tool - Turn on the sandbox with
/sandbox enableor--sandbox. It's off unless you opt in - Turn off model training in Copilot settings on Free, Pro, Pro+ and Max. It's on by default since 24 April 2026
- Run 1.0.88 or later where enterprise policy matters. Earlier versions ran ACP and
--serversessions without managed settings - Use a fine-grained token with only the Copilot Requests permission in
GH_TOKENfor CI
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Other comparisons with GitHub Copilot CLI or OpenCode
- Aider vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenHands
- goose vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
