Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
OpenCode scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
OpenCode B
Best for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 72 against 60
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
- Maintenance & community, 81 against 74
- Transparency & trust, 71 against 59
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | OpenCode | OpenMausBot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 72 | 60 | OpenCode +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 88 | 90 | OpenMausBot +2 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 77 | OpenCode +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 60 | 59 | OpenCode +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 50 | OpenCode +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 81 | 74 | OpenCode +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 71 | 59 | OpenCode +12 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | -2 | |
| Total | B 68.8/100 | B 65.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | OpenCode | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Anomaly | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | no | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-16 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-08-15 | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-03-06 | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 211k stars | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Before you call either
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Install
opencode-aifor the 1.x server API and SDK. Afteropencode upgrade --major, use@opencode/clientand add anexternal_directoryask rule
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, OpenCode or OpenMausBot?
OpenCode scores 68.8 (B) on agent readiness against OpenMausBot's 65.4 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are OpenCode and OpenMausBot open source?
Yes. OpenCode is open source (MIT). OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with OpenCode or OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs OpenCode
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenCode
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs OpenCode
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs OpenCode
- Crush vs OpenMausBot
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenCode
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs OpenCode
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs OpenCode
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs OpenCode
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs OpenCode
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs OpenCode
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs OpenCode
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs OpenCode
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs OpenCode
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenCode
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs Prime Agent
- OpenCode vs Qoder CLI
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Mirror CLI
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Unstoppable
- OpenCode vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenCode vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- CLI Manager vs OpenCode
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- Harness vs OpenCode
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs Paperclip
- OpenCode vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/opencode-vs-openmausbot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/opencode.json·/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare opencode openmausbot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "opencode", "b": "openmausbot"}at/mcp, no key