Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run
CLI Manager vs OpenCode
OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against CLI Manager's 65.8 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Both do multi-agent orchestration.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 243 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where OpenCode loses 4 points for them
Watch for
Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own
OpenCode B
Best for Agents and pipelines that need a scriptable coding agent with a JSON event stream, an HTTP server and any model, including keyless free ones.
Ahead on
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 63
- Maintenance & community, 81 against 62
- Transparency & trust, 67 against 54
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
Watch for
Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | CLI Manager | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 68 | even |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 88 | OpenCode +1 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 79 | OpenCode +16 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 60 | OpenCode +2 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 62 | 81 | OpenCode +19 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 67 | OpenCode +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | B 65.8/100 | B 67.7/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | CLI Manager | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun) | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | |
| Auth | API key | None |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 12 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-09-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-08-15 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-03-06 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | yes |
| Popularity | 15 stars | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | none | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
CLI Manager
An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
CLI Manager
- Ask the user to switch on Settings > Agents > AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from
~/.climanager/control-api.json - On
409 awaiting_input, read the screen and answer withkeyssuch as ["down","enter"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user - Stop using a session on
409 disconnected. The user took it back - Treat
timedOut: truefromwaitas still running, not as a failure, and wait again - Pass
ephemeral: truewhen opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, CLI Manager or OpenCode?
OpenCode scores 67.7 (B) on agent readiness against CLI Manager's 65.8 (B), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories.
Are CLI Manager and OpenCode open source?
Yes. CLI Manager is open source (MIT). OpenCode is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with CLI Manager or OpenCode
- Agent Zero vs OpenCode
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Devin vs OpenCode
- Droid CLI vs OpenCode
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenCode
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kiro CLI vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
- OpenCode vs Prime Agent
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager
- Claude Code vs CLI Manager
- CLI Manager vs Cline
- CLI Manager vs Devin
- CLI Manager vs Droid CLI
- CLI Manager vs Gemini CLI
- CLI Manager vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- CLI Manager vs goose
- CLI Manager vs Kilo Code CLI
- CLI Manager vs Kiro CLI
- CLI Manager vs Muse Code
- CLI Manager vs OpenHands
- CLI Manager vs Paperclip
- CLI Manager vs Prime Agent
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cli-manager-vs-opencode.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json·/api/v1/tools/opencode.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cli-manager opencode(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cli-manager", "b": "opencode"}at/mcp, no key