Head to head · Multi-agent orchestration · October 2026 research run
CLI Manager vs Jules
CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do multi-agent orchestration.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for A developer on macOS who runs several coding agents and wants another agent to start and watch sessions where the person can see and step in.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 13
- Schema & documentation, 87 against 76
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 62 against 18
- Transparency & trust, 54 against 44
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Once switched on, the API can read, type into and close every session in the app, including the user's own
Jules E
Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
Watch for
The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | CLI Manager | Jules | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 13 | CLI Manager +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 87 | 76 | CLI Manager +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 63 | 64 | Jules +1 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 58 | 57 | CLI Manager +1 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 30 | CLI Manager +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 62 | 18 | CLI Manager +44 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 54 | 44 | CLI Manager +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | B 65.8/100 | E 44.5/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | CLI Manager | Jules |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | solhun (Jeong Kyeonghun) | Google LLC |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | Streamable HTTP | HTTP, stdio |
| Auth | API key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closed |
| Tools exposed | 12 | 8 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-13 | 2026-03-09 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-07-30 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-14 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | yes |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 15 stars | 1.3k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
CLI Manager
An agent can open visible terminal sessions, type into them, wait and read the screen through 12 typed MCP tools or a documented REST API, and the user can take any session back. The API reaches every open session once enabled, the app runs only on macOS, and none of the last 35 CI runs on the main branch passed.
Jules
The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.
Before you call either
CLI Manager
- Ask the user to switch on Settings > Agents > AI Control API first, then read the URL and token from
~/.climanager/control-api.json - On
409 awaiting_input, read the screen and answer withkeyssuch as ["down","enter"]. Leave folder-trust and permission choices to the user - Stop using a session on
409 disconnected. The user took it back - Treat
timedOut: truefromwaitas still running, not as a failure, and wait again - Pass
ephemeral: truewhen opening a scratch or worktree folder, and close only sessions you opened
Jules
- Set
requirePlanApproval: trueon sessions that touch shared branches, then call:approvePlanyourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review - Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
- Poll activities with a
create_timefilter and cache them. Activities never change once written - Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
- Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, CLI Manager or Jules?
CLI Manager scores 65.8 (B) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are CLI Manager and Jules open source?
CLI Manager is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Jules.
Other comparisons with CLI Manager or Jules
- Agent Zero vs Jules
- Aider vs Jules
- Amp vs Jules
- Antigravity CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Claude Code vs Jules
- Cline vs Jules
- Crush vs Jules
- Cursor CLI vs Jules
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Jules
- Devin vs Jules
- Droid CLI vs Jules
- Pi vs Jules
- Gemini CLI vs Jules
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Jules
- goose vs Jules
- Harness² vs Jules
- HarnessRouter vs Jules
- Jules vs Junie CLI
- Jules vs Kilo Code CLI
- Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Kiro CLI
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Jules vs OpenAI Codex
- Jules vs OpenCode
- Jules vs OpenHands
- Jules vs Prime Agent
- Jules vs Qoder CLI
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Mirror CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Antigravity CLI vs CLI Manager
- Auggie CLI vs CLI Manager
- Claude Code vs CLI Manager
- CLI Manager vs Cline
- CLI Manager vs Crush
- CLI Manager vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- CLI Manager vs Devin
- CLI Manager vs Droid CLI
- CLI Manager vs Gemini CLI
- CLI Manager vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- CLI Manager vs goose
- CLI Manager vs Harness
- CLI Manager vs HarnessRouter
- CLI Manager vs Junie CLI
- CLI Manager vs Kilo Code CLI
- CLI Manager vs Kimi Code CLI
- CLI Manager vs Kiro CLI
- CLI Manager vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- CLI Manager vs Muse Code
- CLI Manager vs OpenCode
- CLI Manager vs OpenHands
- CLI Manager vs Paperclip
- CLI Manager vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Prime Agent
- CLI Manager vs Qoder CLI
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- CLI Manager vs Mirror CLI
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- CLI Manager vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Harness vs Jules
- Jules vs Paperclip
- Jules vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cli-manager-vs-jules.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cli-manager.json·/api/v1/tools/jules.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cli-manager jules(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cli-manager", "b": "jules"}at/mcp, no key