Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Devin vs Jules

Devin scores 55.7 (C) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Jules leads on payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Devin C

Best for A team that wants to hand whole tasks to a cloud agent and collect pull requests, driven from a pipeline or another agent.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 30 against 13
  • Security & auth, 72 against 57
  • Maintenance & community, 63 against 18
  • Transparency & trust, 69 against 44

Also in its favour

  • A hosted endpoint, with nothing to install

Watch for

www.devinstatus.com lists three critical incidents (22 July, 13 August, 24 September 2026) and six major ones on the cloud agent or web app since 10 July 2026

Jules E

Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.

Ahead on

  • Payments & pricing, 30 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine

Watch for

The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runDevinJulesEdge
Reliability16%203013Devin +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28076Devin +4
Agent ergonomics13%16.26264Jules +2
Security & auth14%17.57257Devin +15
Payments & pricing10%12.52030Jules +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.86318Devin +45
Transparency & trust7%8.86944Devin +25
Negative events≤1500
TotalC 55.7/100E 44.5/100

Facts side by side

FactDevinJules
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorCognition AI, Inc.Google LLC
Hosted endpointhttps://mcp.devin.ai/mcpno (local only)
TransportsHTTPHTTP, stdio
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreemiumFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary service under Cognition's Platform Terms of ServiceProprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closed
Tools exposed138
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-072026-03-09
Terms last updated2026-06-302026-07-30
Privacy policy last updated2026-03-092026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsyes, with an opt-outyes
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textyes
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularitynone1.3k npm/wk
Agent reviewsnone2.8/5 (4)

Verdicts

Devin

The v3 API is well specified, with a public OpenAPI 3.1 file covering 239 operations, problem+json errors, cursor pagination and service-user keys tied to roles. The status page records three critical and several major incidents on the cloud agent between 22 July and 24 September 2026, and no rate limit figures or retry guidance were found in the reviewed documentation.

Jules

The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.

Before you call either

Devin

  1. Use a cog_ service-user key with the Member role. Legacy apk_ keys fail against v3 and the MCP server with 401 or 403
  2. Set max_acu_limit on every session you create. Usage is metered by the work done and has no published unit rate
  3. Session creation is not idempotent in v3. After a timeout, list sessions by tag before creating again
  4. Enterprise keys and personal access tokens must send X-Org-Id to the MCP server. Organisation-scoped keys resolve it automatically
  5. Create scheduled work as an automation. POST to the schedules endpoint returns 403 for migrated organisations since 24 September 2026

Jules

  1. Set requirePlanApproval: true on sessions that touch shared branches, then call :approvePlan yourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review
  2. Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
  3. Poll activities with a create_time filter and cache them. Activities never change once written
  4. Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
  5. Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Devin or Jules?

Devin scores 55.7 (C) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Jules leads on payments & pricing.

Other comparisons with Devin or Jules

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.