Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
Kimi Code CLI scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Jules leads on security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Jules E
Best for A person or pipeline that wants to hand scoped GitHub tasks to a cloud agent and collect a pull request or a patch, or run a repoless job in a disposable VM.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 57 against 45
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- No incidents deducted, where Kimi Code CLI loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The REST API has been v1alpha since 3 October 2025 and the docs say specifications and API keys may change
Best for Developers on Kimi models who want a terminal agent with ACP and a local REST API, or an open-source harness that also runs Claude, GPT or Gemini models.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 13
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 76
- Agent ergonomics, 71 against 64
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 30
- Maintenance & community, 72 against 18
- Transparency & trust, 62 against 44
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Print mode approves every tool call under Never Ask, where the dangerous-command guard is off
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Jules | Kimi Code CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 13 | 68 | Kimi Code CLI +55 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 76 | 85 | Kimi Code CLI +9 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 64 | 71 | Kimi Code CLI +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 45 | Jules +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 30 | 60 | Kimi Code CLI +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 18 | 72 | Kimi Code CLI +54 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 44 | 62 | Kimi Code CLI +18 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | E 44.5/100 | B 62.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Jules | Kimi Code CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Google LLC | Moonshot AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | HTTP, stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary service under the Google Terms of Service. The TypeScript SDK is Apache-2.0; the CLI binary is closed | MIT |
| Tools exposed | 8 | none |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-03-09 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-07-30 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | yes | |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 1.3k npm/wk | 37k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Jules
The API is described by a public Google discovery document, takes only a prompt to start a session, and logs every plan, shell command and diff as activities. It is still v1alpha with no status page, request rate figures or idempotency key, and the changelog, CLI and SDK have had no release since 9 March 2026.
Kimi Code CLI
MIT-licensed, with 32 releases in the 90 days to 14 October 2026, kimi -p with stream-json output, an ACP server and a local REST API with a live OpenAPI document. Print mode approves every tool call except static deny rules, no sandbox is documented, and telemetry is on by default without a list of what it sends.
Before you call either
Jules
- Set
requirePlanApproval: trueon sessions that touch shared branches, then call:approvePlanyourself. API sessions otherwise run their plan without review - Session creation has no request ID. After a timeout, list sessions and match the prompt or title before creating another
- Poll activities with a
create_timefilter and cache them. Activities never change once written - Read the request fields from the discovery document at https://jules.googleapis.com/$discovery/rest?version=v1alpha. The field tables on jules.google render empty
- Budget against the daily task quota of 15, 100 or 300 by plan. New sessions are refused until the rolling 24 hours reset
Kimi Code CLI
kimi -papproves every tool call. Add[[permission.rules]]deny entries and run it in a container, since no sandbox is documented- Set
KIMI_LOOP_MAX_STEPS_PER_TURNfor unattended runs. Steps per turn are unlimited by default - Pass the model with
KIMI_MODEL_NAME,KIMI_MODEL_API_KEYandKIMI_MODEL_PROVIDER_TYPE.OPENAI_API_KEYorANTHROPIC_API_KEYin the shell is ignored otherwise - Set
KIMI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1and use 0.41.0 or later, since earlier print-mode runs ignored it - Install
@moonshot-ai/kimi-codeor thekimi-codeformula. Thekimi-cliandkimi-codepackages on PyPI are the archived Python CLI
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Jules or Kimi Code CLI?
Kimi Code CLI scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Jules's 44.5 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Jules leads on security & auth.
Are Jules and Kimi Code CLI open source?
No open-source release is listed for Jules. Kimi Code CLI is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Jules or Kimi Code CLI
- Agent Zero vs Jules
- Agent Zero vs Kimi Code CLI
- Aider vs Jules
- Aider vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Jules
- Antigravity CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Claude Code vs Jules
- Claude Code vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cline vs Jules
- Cline vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Jules
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Jules
- Cursor CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Jules
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Kimi Code CLI
- Devin vs Jules
- Devin vs Kimi Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Jules
- Droid CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Pi vs Jules
- Pi vs Kimi Code CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Jules
- Gemini CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Jules
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- goose vs Jules
- goose vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness² vs Jules
- Harness² vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Jules
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Junie CLI
- Jules vs Kilo Code CLI
- Jules vs Kiro CLI
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Jules vs OpenAI Codex
- Jules vs OpenCode
- Jules vs OpenHands
- Jules vs Prime Agent
- Jules vs Qoder CLI
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Mirror CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Junie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kimi Code CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Jules
- CLI Manager vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness vs Jules
- Harness vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Paperclip
- Jules vs Parallax
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip
- Kimi Code CLI vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/jules-vs-kimi-code-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/jules.json·/api/v1/tools/kimi-code-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare jules kimi-code-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "jules", "b": "kimi-code-cli"}at/mcp, no key