Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
Kimi Code CLI scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 57 against 45
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 72
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 62
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Kimi Code CLI loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for Developers on Kimi models who want a terminal agent with ACP and a local REST API, or an open-source harness that also runs Claude, GPT or Gemini models.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 68 against 31
- Schema & documentation, 85 against 72
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Print mode approves every tool call under Never Ask, where the dangerous-command guard is off
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Kimi Code CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 68 | Kimi Code CLI +37 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 85 | Kimi Code CLI +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 71 | Kimi Code CLI +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 45 | Amp +12 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 60 | Kimi Code CLI +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 72 | Amp +7 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 62 | Amp +15 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | B 62.1/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Kimi Code CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Moonshot AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-14 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 37k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Kimi Code CLI
MIT-licensed, with 32 releases in the 90 days to 14 October 2026, kimi -p with stream-json output, an ACP server and a local REST API with a live OpenAPI document. Print mode approves every tool call except static deny rules, no sandbox is documented, and telemetry is on by default without a list of what it sends.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Kimi Code CLI
kimi -papproves every tool call. Add[[permission.rules]]deny entries and run it in a container, since no sandbox is documented- Set
KIMI_LOOP_MAX_STEPS_PER_TURNfor unattended runs. Steps per turn are unlimited by default - Pass the model with
KIMI_MODEL_NAME,KIMI_MODEL_API_KEYandKIMI_MODEL_PROVIDER_TYPE.OPENAI_API_KEYorANTHROPIC_API_KEYin the shell is ignored otherwise - Set
KIMI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1and use 0.41.0 or later, since earlier print-mode runs ignored it - Install
@moonshot-ai/kimi-codeor thekimi-codeformula. Thekimi-cliandkimi-codepackages on PyPI are the archived Python CLI
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Kimi Code CLI?
Kimi Code CLI scores 62.1 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on security & auth, maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Are Amp and Kimi Code CLI open source?
No open-source release is listed for Amp. Kimi Code CLI is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Amp or Kimi Code CLI
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Kimi Code CLI
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Claude Code vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cline vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Kimi Code CLI
- Devin vs Kimi Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Pi vs Kimi Code CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- goose vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness² vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
- Junie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kimi Code CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip
- Kimi Code CLI vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-kimi-code-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/kimi-code-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp kimi-code-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "kimi-code-cli"}at/mcp, no key