Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Pi
Pi scores 68.4 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on transparency & trust. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Amp C
Good for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 64
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Pi loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Pi B
Good for Developers and pipelines that want a small, scriptable coding agent they can extend in TypeScript and drive over JSONL or RPC, inside their own container.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 75 against 31
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 72
- Agent ergonomics, 76 against 69
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 35
- Maintenance & community, 87 against 79
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
No permission system or sandbox. Tool calls run with the user's rights and without an approval prompt
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Pi | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 75 | Pi +44 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 84 | Pi +12 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 76 | Pi +7 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 61 | Pi +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 60 | Pi +25 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 87 | Pi +8 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 64 | Amp +13 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 57.1 · C | 68.4 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Pi |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Earendil |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-07 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 113k stars, 5.2M npm/wk |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Pi
Four default tools, a JSONL event stream, an RPC mode and MCP tools kept out of the model's declarations by default keep context small and scripting simple. Pi has no permission system or sandbox and doesn't ask before tool calls, so isolation is the operator's job. Version 1.0.0 is dated 1 October 2026.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Pi
- Run Pi inside a container or VM for unattended work. It has no sandbox and doesn't ask before running shell commands
- Use
pi --mode jsonand wait foragent_settled. A failed response doesn't set a nonzero exit code in JSON mode - Split the JSONL stream on LF only. Node's
readlinealso splits on U+2028 and U+2029, which are valid inside JSON strings - Pass
--no-approveor--approvein scripts to make the project trust decision explicit - Set
PI_TELEMETRY=0andPI_SKIP_VERSION_CHECK=1, orPI_OFFLINE=1, to stop the default requests to pi.dev
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Pi?
Pi scores 68.4 (B) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on transparency & trust.
Are Amp and Pi open source?
No open-source release is listed for Amp. Pi is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Amp or Pi
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Pi
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Pi
- Cline vs Pi
- Cursor CLI vs Pi
- Devin vs Pi
- Pi vs Gemini CLI
- Pi vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs Kiro CLI
- Pi vs OpenAI Codex
- Pi vs OpenCode
- Pi vs OpenHands
- Pi vs Prime Agent
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-earendil-pi.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/earendil-pi.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp earendil-pi(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "earendil-pi"}at/mcp, no key