Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Kiro CLI
Kiro CLI scores 59.9 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Amp C
Good for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 73
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 67
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Kiro CLI loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Kiro CLI C
Good for Teams on AWS that want one agent configuration across terminal, IDE and web, with central permission policy, prompt logging to their own S3 bucket and IAM Identity Centre sign-in.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 57 against 31
- Schema & documentation, 79 against 72
- Security & auth, 66 against 57
- Payments & pricing, 40 against 35
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
Watch for
Free and individual paid accounts have content used for service improvement, including model training, unless they opt out
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Kiro CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 57 | Kiro CLI +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 79 | Kiro CLI +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 67 | Amp +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 66 | Kiro CLI +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 40 | Kiro CLI +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 73 | Amp +6 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 67 | Amp +10 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -4 | |
| Total | 57.1 · C | 59.9 · C |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Kiro CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Amazon Web Services |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Proprietary. Licensed as AWS Content under the AWS Customer Agreement and the AWS Intellectual Property Licence (https://kiro.dev/license/). The GitHub repository is the public issue tracker and doesn't hold the source |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | 2026-08-14 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | 2026-05-18 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | yes |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 4.4k stars |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Kiro CLI
Permission rules follow deny over ask over allow, cloned repositories can't add rules, and a headless session treats every ask as a deny. Content from Free and individual paid accounts is used for service improvement, including model training, unless the user opts out, and API keys for pipelines need a paid plan.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Kiro CLI
- Set
KIRO_API_KEYand pass--no-interactivewith--trust-tools=<list>in pipelines. Keep--trust-all-toolsfor disposable environments - Pass
--require-mcp-startupwhen a run depends on MCP tools. Without it a failed server is logged and the run continues - Pass
--no-interactivewhenever input is piped from a source you don't control, and run 2.10.0 or later on Windows - Run
kiro-cli settings telemetry.enabled falseand turn off content collection on Free and individual plans. Both are on by default - Export variables in the shell before starting. Since 2.24.0 a project
.envfile is no longer loaded into sessions, MCP servers or tools
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Kiro CLI?
Kiro CLI scores 59.9 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 57.1 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on maintenance & community and transparency & trust.
Other comparisons with Amp or Kiro CLI
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Kiro CLI
- Cline vs Kiro CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Devin vs Kiro CLI
- Pi vs Kiro CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Kiro CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- Kiro CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kiro CLI vs OpenCode
- Kiro CLI vs OpenHands
- Kiro CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Kiro CLI vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-kiro-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/kiro-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp kiro-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "kiro-cli"}at/mcp, no key