Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Traycer
Traycer scores 57 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 55.5 (C), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 1500 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 65
- Security & auth, 57 against 42
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 30
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 60
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Traycer C
Best for Teams who want several coding agents working together with shared context and boards.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 65 against 23
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Open source
Watch for
Privacy Mode is opt-in for individuals; with it off, prompts may be logged
Why the edge
Each category where one leads by five points or more, with the reason behind each side's score from its assessment. The numbers are in the table below; this is what they stand for.
Reliability Traycer +42
Amp 23
Local-package reading, as for the other closed-source harnesses. An install script that verifies a SHA-256 checksum, and an @ampcode/cli npm package of prebuilt binaries, for macOS, Linux and Windows through WSL, per the 8 October check (20). The source repository is private, so there is no public CI or test suite (0). There is no public issue tracker, and bug reports go to the vendor from inside the product. The 8 October reading of the status page's incident feed is struck, because ampcodestatus.com's robots.txt now disallows ClaudeBot, Claude-Web and anthropic-ai, so nothing is left to count crash or regression reports against (0). Versions are build stamps such as 0.0.1792627309-g98c009 with no per-version notes, and the introduction says "No backward compatibility", though removals are announced with dates in the Chronicle (3). The version line is 0.0 and we found no statement that the CLI is stable (0).
Traycer 65
Local software. Builds for macOS, Linux and Windows, and package-manager publishing workflows (20). test.yml, CodeQL, OpenSSF Scorecard and secret scanning run on the repository; pass state not read (15). GitHub issues and pull requests weren't read (GitHub's pages refuse these sessions), so that line is scored absent (0). CHANGELOG.md (15). Host 1.5.3 (15). 20 + 15 + 0 + 15 + 15 = 65.
Transparency & trust Amp +17
Amp 77
Closed source under the Amp licence terms from Amp Frontier Corporation, with the npm packages marked Amp Commercial License. The terms page shows no date (15). The security reference lists 19 providers and what each sees, says deleted threads are removed within 30 days, diagnostic data after 7 days and audit logs kept at least 30 days, and the privacy policy (modified 10 September 2026) agrees, with account data kept while the account is active (24). No deprecation policy. The terms allow any part of the Services to be discontinued without notice, while removals so far were announced with dates, such as the old npm package names on 14 May 2026 for removal on 15 June (8). Amp is local software tied to a hosted service. Providers and US hosting are disclosed in detail, but the usage data the client sends is not itemised and has no documented opt-out (12).
Traycer 60
MIT (30). README privacy section and a linked privacy policy (not read) (18 of 30). CHANGELOG.md, no deprecation policy (10). Analytics described as 'may be enabled', with no opt-out given in the README (8 of 20). 30 + 18 + 10 + 8 = 66.
Security & auth Amp +15
Amp 57
Harness reading of the framework checklist, as for the other harnesses. 30 for what leaves the machine by default, 20 for approvals and sandboxing, 15 for prompt-injection posture, 15 for audit and 20 for the security programme. Every thread, with messages, code used as context and tool results, is stored on Amp's servers, and there is no local-only or self-hosted mode. Training on user data is off unless a user opts in, provider retention is limited under Minimal Data Retention, and secrets are redacted before they leave the client on a best-effort basis. The terms allow collection of usage data and we found no opt-out for the CLI (14). The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and points to a custom plugin for control. MCP servers defined in a project's settings need approval, amp.mcpPermissions allows or rejects servers and amp.tools.disable removes tools. The CLI has no sandbox. Orbs are separate cloud machines (6). The security reference has a prompt-injection section that describes layered measures, and the tools page warns about untrusted repositories and MCP servers (9). Threads keep prompts, tool calls and results as a record, a data API covers workspace analytics and threads, and authentication audit logs are for Enterprise workspaces (12). A security.txt that expires on 20 November 2026 (still valid on 4 November), a bug bounty with safe harbour, SOC 2 Type II and annual penetration tests per the vendor. On 22 October 2026 the security page posted an update that removes trust in compromised certificate authorities and names the CLI build to install. No CVEs found (16).
Traycer 42
Harness reading. Code is processed in memory and not used for training, but Privacy Mode is opt-in for individuals, prompts may be logged with it off, and Sentry and PostHog 'may be enabled in release builds' (10 of 30). No approval model described in the README (8 of 20). No prompt-injection guidance (5). No audit log found (5). SECURITY.md, CodeQL, Scorecard and secret scanning (14 of 20). 10 + 8 + 5 + 5 + 14 = 42.
Schema & documentation Amp +7
Amp 72
Framework reading. A JSON Schema for the settings file at ampcode.com/cli-settings.schema.json (22 properties), TypeScript types for every stream message, and a generated reference for the plugin API, but no OpenAPI for the server (18). ampcode.com/llms.txt indexes a raw Markdown rendition of each of 55 docs pages (10). The docs say when to use execute mode, orbs, runners, the oracle and the Librarian, and what each mode is for (15). Settings carry types and defaults, and the stream schema enumerates stop reasons, result subtypes and MCP server states (12). Examples on nearly every page and two result error subtypes (error_during_execution, error_max_turns), with no exit codes or error catalogue (9). Dated Chronicle posts with an RSS feed and a lastModified date on each docs page, but no changelog by CLI version (8).
Traycer 65
Harness reading. Mintlify docs, a protocol package and a CLI (65).
Payments & pricing Amp +5
Amp 35
Harness reading of the published rubric. No payment protocol (0). The pricing page is public. Hobby is free, Megawatt is $20 a month with 45,000 orb minutes, orbs are priced per hour by size from $0.08, and paid credits are charged at provider API prices with no markup outside Enterprise. Gigawatt is $200 a month with $200 of agent usage and 1,000 hours of a1.xxlarge orbs, per the pricing docs (20). Hobby is free when you bring your own model key or subscription and run locally or on your own runner. The pricing page does not say whether sign-up asks for a card, and inference served by Amp is never free (15). A person signs in through a browser to create the access token (0).
Traycer 30
Scored on the paid option, Traycer's own inference subscription, whose price wasn't read (0 of 20). No protocol (0). Bring-your-own-agent use is free (20). Accounts for sync and teams weren't checked, half (10). 0 + 0 + 20 + 10 = 30.
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Traycer | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 23 | 65 | Traycer +42 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 65 | Amp +7 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 65 | Amp +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 42 | Amp +15 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 30 | Amp +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 75 | Amp +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 60 | Amp +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 55.5/100 | C 57/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Traycer |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Traycer AI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | MIT |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-22 | 2026-11-06 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | no document linked |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | no document linked |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | not read yet |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not read yet |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not read yet |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | none |
How the scores have moved
Traycer
No score change since it was listed.
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Traycer
An open-source app for running several coding agents together with shared context, agent-to-agent messaging and team boards, on every desktop OS. Privacy Mode is opt-in for individuals, and the README says Sentry and PostHog may be on in release builds.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI, and pin a build. Updates install automatically and have changed behaviour on release day - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Traycer
- Turn on Privacy Mode if you're an individual user and don't want prompts logged
- CLI agents you configure send requests straight to their provider; Traycer's own inference goes through Traycer
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Traycer?
Traycer scores 57 (C) on agent readiness against Amp's 55.5 (C), and leads in 1 of 7 scored categories. Amp leads on schema & documentation, security & auth, payments & pricing and transparency & trust.
Are Amp and Traycer open source?
No open-source release is listed for Amp. Traycer is open source (MIT).
Other comparisons with Amp or Traycer
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Traycer
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Traycer
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs AXLR
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Conductor
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs dsh-superagent (DeepSeek)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Emdash
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs Letta
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs MiniMax Code
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Agents API
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Orca
- Amp vs Paseo
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Sculptor
- Amp vs T3 Code
- Amp vs Unstoppable
- Amp vs Verdent
- Amp vs Vibe-Trading
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Traycer
- Auggie CLI vs Traycer
- AXLR vs Traycer
- Claude Code vs Traycer
- Cline vs Traycer
- Conductor vs Traycer
- Crush vs Traycer
- Cursor CLI vs Traycer
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Traycer
- dsh-superagent (DeepSeek) vs Traycer
- Devin vs Traycer
- Droid CLI vs Traycer
- Pi vs Traycer
- Emdash vs Traycer
- Gemini CLI vs Traycer
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Traycer
- goose vs Traycer
- Harness² vs Traycer
- HarnessRouter vs Traycer
- Jules vs Traycer
- Junie CLI vs Traycer
- Kilo Code CLI vs Traycer
- Kimi Code CLI vs Traycer
- Kiro CLI vs Traycer
- Letta vs Traycer
- mini-swe-agent vs Traycer
- MiniMax Code vs Traycer
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Traycer
- Muse Code vs Traycer
- OpenAI Agents API vs Traycer
- OpenAI Codex vs Traycer
- OpenCode vs Traycer
- OpenHands vs Traycer
- Orca vs Traycer
- Paseo vs Traycer
- Prime Agent vs Traycer
- Qoder CLI vs Traycer
- Qwen Code vs Traycer
- Mirror CLI vs Traycer
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Traycer
- Sculptor vs Traycer
- T3 Code vs Traycer
- Traycer vs Unstoppable
- Traycer vs Verdent
- Traycer vs Vibe-Trading
- Traycer vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs Clawboo
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- Clawboo vs Traycer
- CLI Manager vs Traycer
- Harness vs Traycer
- OpenMausBot vs Traycer
- Paperclip vs Traycer
- Parallax vs Traycer
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-traycer.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/traycer.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp traycer(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "traycer"}at/mcp, no key