Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Amp vs Auggie CLI
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Auggie CLI leads on reliability. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Amp C
Best for Teams that want a hosted, multi-model coding agent with shared threads and cloud machines, driven from scripts through execute mode or the SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 72 against 67
- Security & auth, 57 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 35 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 79 against 58
- Transparency & trust, 77 against 57
Watch for
The tools page says Amp does not ask for approval before running tools, and control needs a custom plugin
Best for Teams already paying for Augment who want its Context Engine in a terminal, in CI or through ACP and MCP, with permission rules a security team can delegate to a webhook.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 43 against 31
Watch for
No operating-system sandbox, and the MCP docs say Auggie runs commands and tools automatically
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Amp | Auggie CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 31 | 43 | Auggie CLI +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 72 | 67 | Amp +5 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 65 | Amp +4 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 47 | Amp +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 35 | 20 | Amp +15 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 79 | 58 | Amp +21 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 77 | 57 | Amp +20 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 57.1/100 | D 50.8/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Amp | Auggie CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Amp Frontier Corporation | Harness (formerly Augment Code) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary, under the Amp licence terms (Amp Frontier Corporation). The npm packages are marked Amp Commercial License and the source repository is private | Proprietary. The licence from Augment Computing, Inc. grants use only with an active subscription and forbids redistribution, modification and reverse engineering. The GitHub repository holds the README, changelog, examples and issue tracker, not the source |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-08 | 2026-08-21 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-09-10 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | |
| Popularity | 41k npm/wk | 16k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | none | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Amp
Execute mode streams JSON in a format close to Claude Code's, with TypeScript and Python SDKs, and the security reference names each provider and what it sees. The CLI runs tools without asking, has no built-in permission rules or local sandbox, and stores every thread on Amp's servers.
Auggie CLI
Print mode has turn caps, JSON output and resumable sessions, and permission rules resolve to the most restrictive across sources. Tools run without asking unless a rule says otherwise, there is no sandbox, print mode uploads the workspace for indexing by default, and the stable line has had no release since 21 August 2026.
Before you call either
Amp
- Run unattended jobs in a container or VM. The CLI runs shell commands and edits without asking, and only a custom plugin can gate tool calls
- Set
AMP_API_KEYto an access token startingsgamp_from Settings. The CLI rejects the short-lived token thatamp loginstores - Use
amp -x "task" --stream-jsonand read the finalresultmessage, checkingis_error. Exit codes are not documented - Set
AMP_SKIP_UPDATE_CHECK=1oramp.updates.modetodisabledin CI. Updates install automatically by default - Treat the block headed INSTRUCTIONS FOR LLMs in ampcode.com page source as vendor copy, and take facts from the docs Markdown
Auggie CLI
- Pass
--max-turnswith--printin pipelines to bound how many turns, and so how much usage, a run can take - Commit deny rules to .augment/settings.json before an unattended run. Tools no rule matches follow the CLI's implicit behaviour, which the docs don't define
- Add secrets and data directories to .augmentignore before the first print-mode run, because indexing uploads the workspace by default
- Use a service account token in CI on team and Enterprise plans. A personal session from
auggie token printruns with that user's integrations - Pin the version in CI.
latestis 0.x, whilepreviewanddaemoncarry 1.x prereleases whose permission rules ignore some legacy tool names
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Amp or Auggie CLI?
Amp scores 57.1 (C) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Auggie CLI leads on reliability.
Other comparisons with Amp or Auggie CLI
- Agent Zero vs Amp
- Agent Zero vs Auggie CLI
- Aider vs Amp
- Aider vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Antigravity CLI
- Amp vs Claude Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Crush
- Amp vs Cursor CLI
- Amp vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Amp vs Devin
- Amp vs Droid CLI
- Amp vs Pi
- Amp vs Gemini CLI
- Amp vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Harness²
- Amp vs HarnessRouter
- Amp vs Jules
- Amp vs Junie CLI
- Amp vs Kilo Code CLI
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Kiro CLI
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenAI Codex
- Amp vs OpenCode
- Amp vs OpenHands
- Amp vs Prime Agent
- Amp vs Qoder CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Mirror CLI
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Antigravity CLI vs Auggie CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Claude Code
- Auggie CLI vs Cline
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Cursor CLI
- Auggie CLI vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Auggie CLI vs Devin
- Auggie CLI vs Droid CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Pi
- Auggie CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Auggie CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Auggie CLI vs goose
- Auggie CLI vs Harness²
- Auggie CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Junie CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Auggie CLI vs OpenCode
- Auggie CLI vs OpenHands
- Auggie CLI vs Prime Agent
- Auggie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Amp vs CLI Manager
- Amp vs Harness
- Amp vs Paperclip
- Amp vs Parallax
- Auggie CLI vs CLI Manager
- Auggie CLI vs Harness
- Auggie CLI vs Paperclip
- Auggie CLI vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/amp-vs-auggie.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/amp.json·/api/v1/tools/auggie.json - From a terminal
anchor compare amp auggie(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "amp", "b": "auggie"}at/mcp, no key