Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in every scored category. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Teams already paying for Augment who want its Context Engine in a terminal, in CI or through ACP and MCP, with permission rules a security team can delegate to a webhook.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
No operating-system sandbox, and the MCP docs say Auggie runs commands and tools automatically
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 69 against 43
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 67
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 65
- Security & auth, 53 against 47
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 58
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 57
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Auggie CLI | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 43 | 69 | Qwen Code +26 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 67 | 91 | Qwen Code +24 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 65 | 85 | Qwen Code +20 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 47 | 53 | Qwen Code +6 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 60 | Qwen Code +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 58 | 88 | Qwen Code +30 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 63 | Qwen Code +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | D 50.8/100 | BB 72.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Auggie CLI | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Harness (formerly Augment Code) | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary. The licence from Augment Computing, Inc. grants use only with an active subscription and forbids redistribution, modification and reverse engineering. The GitHub repository holds the README, changelog, examples and issue tracker, not the source | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-08-21 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 16k npm/wk | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.8/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Auggie CLI
Print mode has turn caps, JSON output and resumable sessions, and permission rules resolve to the most restrictive across sources. Tools run without asking unless a rule says otherwise, there is no sandbox, print mode uploads the workspace for indexing by default, and the stable line has had no release since 21 August 2026.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
Auggie CLI
- Pass
--max-turnswith--printin pipelines to bound how many turns, and so how much usage, a run can take - Commit deny rules to .augment/settings.json before an unattended run. Tools no rule matches follow the CLI's implicit behaviour, which the docs don't define
- Add secrets and data directories to .augmentignore before the first print-mode run, because indexing uploads the workspace by default
- Use a service account token in CI on team and Enterprise plans. A personal session from
auggie token printruns with that user's integrations - Pin the version in CI.
latestis 0.x, whilepreviewanddaemoncarry 1.x prereleases whose permission rules ignore some legacy tool names
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Auggie CLI or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Auggie CLI's 50.8 (D), and leads in every scored category.
Are Auggie CLI and Qwen Code open source?
No open-source release is listed for Auggie CLI. Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Auggie CLI or Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs Auggie CLI
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs Auggie CLI
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Auggie CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Auggie CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Claude Code
- Auggie CLI vs Cline
- Auggie CLI vs Crush
- Auggie CLI vs Cursor CLI
- Auggie CLI vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Auggie CLI vs Devin
- Auggie CLI vs Droid CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Pi
- Auggie CLI vs Gemini CLI
- Auggie CLI vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Auggie CLI vs goose
- Auggie CLI vs Harness²
- Auggie CLI vs HarnessRouter
- Auggie CLI vs Jules
- Auggie CLI vs Junie CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kilo Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Auggie CLI vs OpenCode
- Auggie CLI vs OpenHands
- Auggie CLI vs Prime Agent
- Auggie CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Auggie CLI vs CLI Manager
- Auggie CLI vs Harness
- Auggie CLI vs Paperclip
- Auggie CLI vs Parallax
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/auggie-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/auggie.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare auggie qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "auggie", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key