Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Kimi Code CLI vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Kimi Code CLI's 62.1 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers on Kimi models who want a terminal agent with ACP and a local REST API, or an open-source harness that also runs Claude, GPT or Gemini models.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Print mode approves every tool call under Never Ask, where the dangerous-command guard is off
Qwen Code BB
Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 85
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 71
- Security & auth, 53 against 45
- Maintenance & community, 88 against 72
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where Kimi Code CLI loses 4 points for them
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Kimi Code CLI | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 68 | 69 | Qwen Code +1 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 85 | 91 | Qwen Code +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 71 | 85 | Qwen Code +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 45 | 53 | Qwen Code +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 60 | even |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 72 | 88 | Qwen Code +16 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 62 | 63 | Qwen Code +1 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | B 62.1/100 | BB 72.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Kimi Code CLI | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Moonshot AI | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Free | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-14 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2026-10-01 | |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | not found in the text | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 37k npm/wk | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 2.8/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Kimi Code CLI
MIT-licensed, with 32 releases in the 90 days to 14 October 2026, kimi -p with stream-json output, an ACP server and a local REST API with a live OpenAPI document. Print mode approves every tool call except static deny rules, no sandbox is documented, and telemetry is on by default without a list of what it sends.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
Kimi Code CLI
kimi -papproves every tool call. Add[[permission.rules]]deny entries and run it in a container, since no sandbox is documented- Set
KIMI_LOOP_MAX_STEPS_PER_TURNfor unattended runs. Steps per turn are unlimited by default - Pass the model with
KIMI_MODEL_NAME,KIMI_MODEL_API_KEYandKIMI_MODEL_PROVIDER_TYPE.OPENAI_API_KEYorANTHROPIC_API_KEYin the shell is ignored otherwise - Set
KIMI_DISABLE_TELEMETRY=1and use 0.41.0 or later, since earlier print-mode runs ignored it - Install
@moonshot-ai/kimi-codeor thekimi-codeformula. Thekimi-cliandkimi-codepackages on PyPI are the archived Python CLI
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Kimi Code CLI or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Kimi Code CLI's 62.1 (B), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Kimi Code CLI and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. Kimi Code CLI is open source (MIT). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Kimi Code CLI or Qwen Code
- Agent Zero vs Kimi Code CLI
- Agent Zero vs Qwen Code
- Aider vs Kimi Code CLI
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Kimi Code CLI
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Qwen Code
- Auggie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Kimi Code CLI
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Crush vs Kimi Code CLI
- Crush vs Qwen Code
- Cursor CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Kimi Code CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Kimi Code CLI
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Droid CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Droid CLI vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Kimi Code CLI
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Kimi Code CLI
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Harness² vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness² vs Qwen Code
- HarnessRouter vs Kimi Code CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Qwen Code
- Jules vs Kimi Code CLI
- Jules vs Qwen Code
- Junie CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Junie CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Kimi Code CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Kiro CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenCode
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenHands
- Kimi Code CLI vs Prime Agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Qoder CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Mirror CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Qoder CLI vs Qwen Code
- Qwen Code vs Mirror CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Kimi Code CLI
- CLI Manager vs Qwen Code
- Harness vs Kimi Code CLI
- Harness vs Qwen Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Paperclip
- Kimi Code CLI vs Parallax
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
- Parallax vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/kimi-code-cli-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/kimi-code-cli.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare kimi-code-cli qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "kimi-code-cli", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key