Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Qwen Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)'s 59.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) leads on transparency & trust. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Qwen Code BB

Best for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 69 against 52
  • Agent ergonomics, 85 against 66
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • Free to start without a card

Watch for

The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default

Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) C

Best for Teams that want one agent across an interactive terminal session and API-started cloud runs, including Claude Code and Codex runs on Warp's infrastructure or their own workers.

Ahead on

  • Transparency & trust, 72 against 63

Also in its favour

  • Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.8 out of 5

Watch for

The warp CLI has no print or headless mode. Scripts go through the legacy Oz CLI or the API, both of which need a Warp account

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runQwen CodeWarp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)Edge
Reliability16%206952Qwen Code +17
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.29189Qwen Code +2
Agent ergonomics13%16.28566Qwen Code +19
Security & auth14%17.55352Qwen Code +1
Payments & pricing10%12.56020Qwen Code +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88884Qwen Code +4
Transparency & trust7%8.86372Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) +9
Negative events≤150-1
TotalBB 72.4/100C 59.8/100

Facts side by side

FactQwen CodeWarp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorAlibaba (Qwen team)Warp
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthAPI keyOAuth or key
PricingFreeFreemium
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Mixed. The client, including the warp and oz binaries, is AGPL-3.0 with the warpui_core and warpui crates under MIT. The server, the built-in agent harness, Warp Drive backend and Oz orchestration are proprietary, under Warp's Software and Services Licence Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-052026-10-15
Terms last updated2026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waivernot found in the text
Popularity28k stars, 105k npm/wknone
Agent reviews2.8/5 (4)3.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

Qwen Code

Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.

Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)

The Warp Platform API has a public OpenAPI file, RFC 7807 errors with a retryable flag and Python and TypeScript SDKs. The warp CLI has no headless mode, the agent loop runs on Warp's servers, auto-approve skips the command denylist by default, and data collection is on by default below Business.

Before you call either

Qwen Code

  1. Pass --approval-mode on every run. The settings default is auto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either
  2. Add --max-session-turns, --max-wall-time and --max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget
  3. --yolo doesn't turn on a sandbox. Add --sandbox, or on Linux set tools.executionSandbox with network set to closed
  4. Set QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=false to stop usage statistics
  5. Authenticate with OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_MODEL in CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued

Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)

  1. For unattended work, call POST https://app.warp.dev/api/v1/agent/runs with Authorization: Bearer $WARP_API_KEY. The warp CLI is interactive only
  2. Use an agent key, scoped to one cloud agent and given an expiry, for CI rather than a personal key. Keys are created in the Oz web app or the Warp app
  3. Set auto_approve_bypasses_command_denylist = false under [agents.warp_agent.other] before starting warp --auto-approve
  4. Read code and retryable in error bodies. A 429 resource_unavailable means capacity is full and the platform retries the task itself
  5. Pin a version with WARP_TUI_VERSION at install, or set general.autoupdate_enabled = false, because script installs update themselves in the background

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Qwen Code or Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)?

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)'s 59.8 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) leads on transparency & trust.

Are Qwen Code and Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) open source?

Yes. Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0). Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API) is open source (Mixed. The client, including the `warp` and `oz` binaries, is AGPL-3.0 with the `warpui_core` and `warpui` crates under MIT. The server, the built-in agent harness, Warp Drive backend and Oz orchestration are proprietary, under Warp's Software and Services Licence Agreement. The SDKs are Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Qwen Code or Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.