Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Cline vs Qwen Code
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Cline's 60.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cline leads on reliability. Both do agent harness.
Which one, for what
Cline C
Good for Developers who want an agent inside VS Code or JetBrains that asks before acting and can roll back, with the same engine in a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 69
Watch for
The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider
Qwen Code BB
Good for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 91 against 77
- Agent ergonomics, 85 against 67
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 50
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No incidents deducted, where Cline loses 8 points for them
Watch for
The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cline | Qwen Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 69 | Cline +11 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 91 | Qwen Code +14 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 85 | Qwen Code +18 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 53 | Cline +4 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 60 | Qwen Code +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 88 | Qwen Code +3 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 63 | Qwen Code +2 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |
| Total | 60.4 · C | 72.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cline | Qwen Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cline Bot Inc. | Alibaba (Qwen team) |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Free |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-05 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-09-25 | 2026-10-01 |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-09-24 | 2026-10-01 |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 68k stars | 28k stars, 105k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
Cline
Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.
Qwen Code
Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.
Before you call either
Cline
- Set
CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONSwith allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default - Pick a provider with
-Pand a key, or runcline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in - Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
- Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
- Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later
Qwen Code
- Pass
--approval-modeon every run. The settings default isauto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either - Add
--max-session-turns,--max-wall-timeand--max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget --yolodoesn't turn on a sandbox. Add--sandbox, or on Linux settools.executionSandboxwithnetworkset toclosed- Set
QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=falseto stop usage statistics - Authenticate with
OPENAI_API_KEY,OPENAI_BASE_URLandOPENAI_MODELin CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cline or Qwen Code?
Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Cline's 60.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cline leads on reliability.
Are Cline and Qwen Code open source?
Yes. Cline is open source (Apache-2.0). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Cline or Qwen Code
- Aider vs Cline
- Aider vs Qwen Code
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Qwen Code
- Claude Code vs Cline
- Claude Code vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Cursor CLI
- Cline vs Devin
- Cline vs Pi
- Cline vs Gemini CLI
- Cline vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs Kiro CLI
- Cline vs OpenAI Codex
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Cline vs Prime Agent
- Cursor CLI vs Qwen Code
- Devin vs Qwen Code
- Pi vs Qwen Code
- Gemini CLI vs Qwen Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Kiro CLI vs Qwen Code
- OpenAI Codex vs Qwen Code
- OpenCode vs Qwen Code
- OpenHands vs Qwen Code
- Prime Agent vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Paperclip
- Paperclip vs Qwen Code
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cline-vs-qwen-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cline.json·/api/v1/tools/qwen-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cline qwen-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cline", "b": "qwen-code"}at/mcp, no key