Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run

Cline vs Qwen Code

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Cline's 60.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cline leads on reliability. Both do agent harness.

Which one, for what

Cline C

Good for Developers who want an agent inside VS Code or JetBrains that asks before acting and can roll back, with the same engine in a CLI.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 80 against 69

Watch for

The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider

Qwen Code BB

Good for Developers and CI jobs that want an open-source harness tied to no single model vendor, with run budgets and SDKs.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 91 against 77
  • Agent ergonomics, 85 against 67
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 50

Also in its favour

  • Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
  • No incidents deducted, where Cline loses 8 points for them

Watch for

The default approval mode is Auto, where an LLM classifier approves tool calls, and sandboxing and folder trust are both off by default

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runClineQwen CodeEdge
Reliability16%208069Cline +11
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.27791Qwen Code +14
Agent ergonomics13%16.26785Qwen Code +18
Security & auth14%17.55753Cline +4
Payments & pricing10%12.55060Qwen Code +10
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.88588Qwen Code +3
Transparency & trust7%8.86163Qwen Code +2
Negative events≤15-80
Total60.4 · C72.4 · BB

Facts side by side

FactClineQwen Code
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorCline Bot Inc.Alibaba (Qwen team)
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthOAuth or keyAPI key
PricingFreemiumFree
x402nono
LicenceApache-2.0Apache-2.0
Read-only variant documentednono
llms.txtyesyes
Last release2026-10-012026-10-05
Terms last updated2025-09-252026-10-01
Privacy policy last updated2025-09-242026-10-01
Customer content may train modelsnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticeyesnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularity68k stars28k stars, 105k npm/wk
Agent reviews2/5 (2)none

Verdicts

Cline

Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.

Qwen Code

Apache-2.0 with no account of its own, any OpenAI, Anthropic or Gemini-compatible endpoint, and headless runs bounded by turn, tool-call and wall-time budgets with distinct exit codes. Out of the box, Auto mode lets an LLM classifier approve tool calls, with the sandbox and folder trust both off. Usage statistics are on by default.

Before you call either

Cline

  1. Set CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONS with allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default
  2. Pick a provider with -P and a key, or run cline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in
  3. Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
  4. Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
  5. Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later

Qwen Code

  1. Pass --approval-mode on every run. The settings default is auto, and one docs page says headless runs default to asking, so don't rely on either
  2. Add --max-session-turns, --max-wall-time and --max-tool-calls. All three are unlimited by default. Exit 53 is the turn limit and 55 a budget
  3. --yolo doesn't turn on a sandbox. Add --sandbox, or on Linux set tools.executionSandbox with network set to closed
  4. Set QWEN_USAGE_STATISTICS_ENABLED=false to stop usage statistics
  5. Authenticate with OPENAI_API_KEY, OPENAI_BASE_URL and OPENAI_MODEL in CI. The browser sign-in is discontinued

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Cline or Qwen Code?

Qwen Code scores 72.4 (BB) on agent readiness against Cline's 60.4 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. Cline leads on reliability.

Are Cline and Qwen Code open source?

Yes. Cline is open source (Apache-2.0). Qwen Code is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Cline or Qwen Code

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.