Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Cline vs OpenAI Codex
OpenAI Codex has a score of 73.4 (BB) against Cline's 60.8 (C). Both do agent harness. The largest gap is reliability, 25 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cline for
- reliability (+25)
Pick OpenAI Codex for
- schema & documentation (+13)
- agent ergonomics (+13)
- security & auth (+25)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- transparency & trust (+17)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cline | OpenAI Codex | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 55 | Cline +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 90 | OpenAI Codex +13 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 80 | OpenAI Codex +13 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 82 | OpenAI Codex +25 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 60 | OpenAI Codex +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 87 | OpenAI Codex +2 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 83 | OpenAI Codex +17 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | -2 | |
| Total | 60.8 · C | 73.4 · BB |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cline | OpenAI Codex |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cline Bot Inc. | OpenAI |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 (Codex CLI, its Rust crates and the TypeScript and Python SDKs). Codex cloud is a hosted service under OpenAI's terms |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-01 |
| Popularity | 68k stars | 126k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 3/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cline
Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.
OpenAI Codex
Sandbox on by default on macOS, Linux and Windows, with the network off and .git and .codex read-only. Pre-1.0 at 0.160.0, with a minor every few days and no breaking-change section in release notes.
Before you call either
Cline
- Set
CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONSwith allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default - Pick a provider with
-Pand a key, or runcline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in - Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
- Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
- Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later
OpenAI Codex
- Run
codex exec --jsonin pipelines, with--output-schemawhen the final message has to parse - Keep the default sandbox.
--yoloremoves both the sandbox and approvals - Set
network_access = trueunder[sandbox_workspace_write]only for tasks that need it. Network is off by default - Set
[analytics] enabled = falseand[feedback] enabled = falsein config.toml to keep usage data local - Pin the npm version. A 0.x minor lands every few days
Other comparisons with Cline or OpenAI Codex
- Aider vs Cline
- Aider vs OpenAI Codex
- Claude Code vs Cline
- Claude Code vs OpenAI Codex
- Cline vs Cursor CLI
- Cline vs Gemini CLI
- Cline vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Cursor CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- Gemini CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenHands
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cline.json·/api/v1/tools/openai-codex.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cline-vs-openai-codex.md