Head to head · Agent harness · October 2026 research run
Cline vs OpenCode
OpenCode has a score of 68 (B) against Cline's 60.8 (C). Both do agent harness. The largest gap is reliability, 12 points.
Which one, for what
Pick Cline for
- reliability (+12)
Pick OpenCode for
- schema & documentation (+11)
- agent ergonomics (+12)
- payments & pricing (+10)
- transparency & trust (+5)
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cline | OpenCode | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 68 | Cline +12 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 88 | OpenCode +11 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 79 | OpenCode +12 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 60 | OpenCode +3 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 60 | OpenCode +10 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 81 | Cline +4 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 66 | 71 | OpenCode +5 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | -4 | |
| Total | 60.8 · C | 68 · B |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cline | OpenCode |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cline Bot Inc. | Anomaly |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | None |
| Pricing | Freemium | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Tools exposed | none | none |
| Context cost (tools/list) | n/a | n/a |
| p95 latency | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Availability (30d) | not measured yet | not measured yet |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| MCP registry | not listed | not listed |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-09-30 |
| Popularity | 68k stars | 211k stars |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 2/5 (2) |
Verdicts
Cline
Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.
OpenCode
Runs with no key or account on free OpenCode Zen models. Most permissions default to allow, and SECURITY.md says the permission system is not a sandbox.
Before you call either
Cline
- Set
CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONSwith allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default - Pick a provider with
-Pand a key, or runcline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in - Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
- Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
- Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later
OpenCode
- Add deny rules for
bashpatterns andexternal_directorybefore an unattended run. Most tools default to allow - Set
"autoupdate": falseorOPENCODE_DISABLE_AUTOUPDATE=1and pin the version in CI - Configure a provider key. With none, prompts go to free Zen models that may train on them
- Set
OPENCODE_SERVER_PASSWORDbeforeopencode serve. Without it the server runs unauthenticated - Use
opencode run --format jsonand read the event stream rather than the formatted output
Other comparisons with Cline or OpenCode
- Aider vs Cline
- Aider vs OpenCode
- Claude Code vs Cline
- Claude Code vs OpenCode
- Cline vs Cursor CLI
- Cline vs Gemini CLI
- Cline vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs OpenAI Codex
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Cursor CLI vs OpenCode
- Gemini CLI vs OpenCode
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenCode
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenCode
- OpenCode vs OpenHands
Machine-readable
/api/v1/tools/cline.json·/api/v1/tools/opencode.json- This page as Markdown,
/compare/cline-vs-opencode.md