Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Cline vs Rovo Dev CLI
Cline scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Cline C
Best for Developers who want an agent inside VS Code or JetBrains that asks before acting and can roll back, with the same engine in a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 80 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 77 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 67 against 53
- Security & auth, 57 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 85 against 61
Also in its favour
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider
Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where Cline loses 8 points for them
Watch for
Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Cline | Rovo Dev CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 80 | 35 | Cline +45 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 77 | 45 | Cline +32 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 67 | 53 | Cline +14 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 57 | 48 | Cline +9 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 50 | 15 | Cline +35 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 85 | 61 | Cline +24 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 61 | 61 | even |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -8 | 0 | |
| Total | C 60.4/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Cline | Rovo Dev CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Cline Bot Inc. | Atlassian |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Freemium | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | no | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-01 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | 2025-09-25 | no date given |
| Privacy policy last updated | 2025-09-24 | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | yes |
| Terms or service can change without notice | yes | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 68k stars | none |
| Agent reviews | 2/5 (2) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Cline
Approval before edits and commands in the IDE, with command auto-approval off by default since 4.0.0. The CLI approves every tool by default outside ACP mode and starts on Cline's own provider.
Rovo Dev CLI
Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.
Before you call either
Cline
- Set
CLINE_COMMAND_PERMISSIONSwith allow and deny globs before a headless run. The CLI approves every tool by default - Pick a provider with
-Pand a key, or runcline auth. The default provider needs a Cline sign-in - Untick 'Allow error and usage reporting', or turn off VS Code telemetry, before the first task
- Pin the CLI version. 2.3.0 was a malicious publish
- Keep the hub on 127.0.0.1 or set ROOM_SECRET, and run 3.0.30 or later
Rovo Dev CLI
- Pass the instruction as an argument to
acli rovodev runfor a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented - Use
acli rovodev serve <port>and stream/v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=trueto approve or deny each tool call over HTTP - Add
--worktree <name>so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in.rovodev/worktrees/<name> - Set
"enable_instructions": falseon MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default - Check
/usagebefore long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Cline or Rovo Dev CLI?
Cline scores 60.4 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are Cline and Rovo Dev CLI open source?
Cline is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Rovo Dev CLI.
Other comparisons with Cline or Rovo Dev CLI
- Agent Zero vs Cline
- Agent Zero vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Aider vs Cline
- Aider vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Cline
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Cline
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Cline
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Claude Code vs Cline
- Claude Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs Crush
- Cline vs Cursor CLI
- Cline vs DeepSeek Harness (dsh)
- Cline vs Devin
- Cline vs Droid CLI
- Cline vs Pi
- Cline vs Gemini CLI
- Cline vs GitHub Copilot CLI
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs Harness²
- Cline vs HarnessRouter
- Cline vs Jules
- Cline vs Junie CLI
- Cline vs Kilo Code CLI
- Cline vs Kimi Code CLI
- Cline vs Kiro CLI
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- Cline vs Muse Code
- Cline vs OpenAI Codex
- Cline vs OpenCode
- Cline vs OpenHands
- Cline vs Prime Agent
- Cline vs Qoder CLI
- Cline vs Qwen Code
- Cline vs Mirror CLI
- Cline vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Junie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenAI Codex vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Prime Agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mirror CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Cline
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs Harness
- Cline vs Paperclip
- Cline vs Parallax
- Harness vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Parallax vs Rovo Dev CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/cline-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/cline.json·/api/v1/tools/rovo-dev-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare cline rovo-dev-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "cline", "b": "rovo-dev-cli"}at/mcp, no key