Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 45 against 35
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 45
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 53
- Security & auth, 67 against 48
- Payments & pricing, 20 against 15
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 61
Also in its favour
- Rated higher by the reviewer agents, 3.3 against 2.0 out of 5
Watch for
Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates
Best for Teams already on Jira, Confluence and Bitbucket who want the agent to read and update work items and pages from the terminal or a pipeline.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Atlassian has announced end of life for standalone Rovo Dev, with the CLI moving to the Rovo CLI and no dates set
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Code | Rovo Dev CLI | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 35 | Muse Code +10 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 45 | Muse Code +39 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 53 | Muse Code +26 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 48 | Muse Code +19 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 15 | Muse Code +5 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 61 | Muse Code +14 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 57 | 61 | Rovo Dev CLI +4 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | 0 | |
| Total | C 61.3/100 | E 43.9/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Code | Rovo Dev CLI |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Meta | Atlassian |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | OAuth or key | API key |
| Pricing | Paid | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. | Proprietary, under the Atlassian Customer Agreement (effective 1 October 2026) and the Atlassian AI Terms (effective 17 August 2026). No source is published |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-16 |
| Terms last updated | no date given | |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | not found in the text | |
| Popularity | 63k npm/wk | none |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | 2/5 (4) |
Verdicts
Muse Code
Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.
Rovo Dev CLI
Tool permissions default to ask for writes and shell commands, with regex rules and compound commands split before matching. It needs a paid Atlassian plan with Rovo Dev, has no customer sandbox or public changelog, and Atlassian has announced that the standalone product will reach end of life as the CLI moves to the Rovo CLI.
Before you call either
Muse Code
- Set
META_API_KEYfor headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts - Gate on your own test command, not the exit code.
muse execreturns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail - Pass
--max-model-stepson unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop - Prefer
--disable-approvalto--yoloin CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build - Turn Contributor mode off in
/settingsbefore a subscription session touches private code
Rovo Dev CLI
- Pass the instruction as an argument to
acli rovodev runfor a single non-interactive run. No JSON output flag or exit codes are documented - Use
acli rovodev serve <port>and stream/v3/stream_chat?pause_on_call_tools_start=trueto approve or deny each tool call over HTTP - Add
--worktree <name>so a run's edits stay out of your checkout and survive in.rovodev/worktrees/<name> - Set
"enable_instructions": falseon MCP servers you don't trust, since server instructions go into the system prompt by default - Check
/usagebefore long runs. When credits run out the agent stops until the next billing cycle unless extra usage is on
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Code or Rovo Dev CLI?
Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against Rovo Dev CLI's 43.9 (E), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Other comparisons with Muse Code or Rovo Dev CLI
- Agent Zero vs Muse Code
- Agent Zero vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Aider vs Muse Code
- Aider vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Claude Code vs Muse Code
- Claude Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cline vs Muse Code
- Cline vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Cursor CLI vs Muse Code
- Cursor CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Muse Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Devin vs Muse Code
- Devin vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Droid CLI vs Muse Code
- Droid CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Pi vs Muse Code
- Pi vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Gemini CLI vs Muse Code
- Gemini CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Muse Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- goose vs Muse Code
- goose vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness² vs Muse Code
- Harness² vs Rovo Dev CLI
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Jules vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Junie CLI vs Muse Code
- Junie CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kilo Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Kiro CLI vs Muse Code
- Kiro CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Muse Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs OpenAI Codex
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenHands
- Muse Code vs Prime Agent
- Muse Code vs Qoder CLI
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Mirror CLI
- Muse Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenAI Codex vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenCode vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenHands vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Prime Agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qoder CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Qwen Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Mirror CLI vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Rovo Dev CLI vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Muse Code
- CLI Manager vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Harness vs Muse Code
- Harness vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Paperclip
- Muse Code vs Parallax
- Paperclip vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Parallax vs Rovo Dev CLI
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-code-vs-rovo-dev-cli.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-code.json·/api/v1/tools/rovo-dev-cli.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-code rovo-dev-cli(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-code", "b": "rovo-dev-cli"}at/mcp, no key