Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
goose vs Muse Code
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 226 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
goose BB
Best for People and pipelines that want one agent across many model providers or local models, with recipes for repeatable jobs and a desktop app for non-engineers.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 77 against 45
- Security & auth, 77 against 67
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
- Maintenance & community, 86 against 75
- Transparency & trust, 63 against 57
Also in its favour
- Agent-ready, a grade of BB or better
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default
Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.
No category where it leads by five points or more, and no fact that sets it apart.
Watch for
Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | goose | Muse Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 77 | 45 | goose +32 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 81 | 84 | Muse Code +3 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 82 | 79 | goose +3 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 77 | 67 | goose +10 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | goose +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 86 | 75 | goose +11 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 63 | 57 | goose +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -2 | 0 | |
| Total | BB 73.9/100 | C 61.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | goose | Muse Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Agentic AI Foundation (originally Block) | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | yes | yes |
| Last release | 2026-09-23 | 2026-10-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 55k stars | 63k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 2.5/5 (2) | none |
Verdicts
goose
Telemetry off until the user opts in, with the collected fields listed. Autonomous mode, which approves every tool call, is the default.
Muse Code
Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.
Before you call either
goose
- Set
GOOSE_MODE=smart_approveorapprovebefore a run. The default approves everything - Pass
--max-turnswith a real limit. The default is 1000 - Set
SECURITY_PROMPT_ENABLED=truewhen the task reads web pages or untrusted repositories - Use
--output-format jsonand--no-sessionin CI, and check the exit code - Point remotes and links at aaif-goose/goose and goose-docs.ai. The block/goose paths redirect
Muse Code
- Set
META_API_KEYfor headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts - Gate on your own test command, not the exit code.
muse execreturns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail - Pass
--max-model-stepson unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop - Prefer
--disable-approvalto--yoloin CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build - Turn Contributor mode off in
/settingsbefore a subscription session touches private code
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, goose or Muse Code?
goose scores 73.9 (BB) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.3 (C), and leads in 6 of 7 scored categories.
Are goose and Muse Code open source?
goose is open source (Apache-2.0). No open-source release is listed for Muse Code.
Other comparisons with goose or Muse Code
- Agent Zero vs goose
- Agent Zero vs Muse Code
- Aider vs goose
- Aider vs Muse Code
- Amp vs goose
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs goose
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Claude Code vs goose
- Claude Code vs Muse Code
- Cline vs goose
- Cline vs Muse Code
- Cursor CLI vs goose
- Cursor CLI vs Muse Code
- Devin vs goose
- Devin vs Muse Code
- Droid CLI vs goose
- Droid CLI vs Muse Code
- Pi vs goose
- Pi vs Muse Code
- Gemini CLI vs goose
- Gemini CLI vs Muse Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs goose
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Muse Code
- goose vs Kilo Code CLI
- goose vs Kiro CLI
- goose vs OpenAI Codex
- goose vs OpenCode
- goose vs OpenHands
- goose vs Prime Agent
- goose vs Qwen Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kiro CLI vs Muse Code
- Muse Code vs OpenAI Codex
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenHands
- Muse Code vs Prime Agent
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- goose vs Paperclip
- Muse Code vs Paperclip
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/goose-vs-muse-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/goose.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare goose muse-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "goose", "b": "muse-code"}at/mcp, no key