Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

Muse Code vs OpenMausBot

OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

Muse Code C

Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.

Ahead on

  • Security & auth, 67 against 59

Watch for

Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates

OpenMausBot B

Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 60 against 45
  • Schema & documentation, 90 against 84
  • Payments & pricing, 50 against 20

Also in its favour

  • Runs on your own machine
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runMuse CodeOpenMausBotEdge
Reliability16%204560OpenMausBot +15
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.28490OpenMausBot +6
Agent ergonomics13%16.27977Muse Code +2
Security & auth14%17.56759Muse Code +8
Payments & pricing10%12.52050OpenMausBot +30
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.87574Muse Code +1
Transparency & trust7%8.85659OpenMausBot +3
Negative events≤150-2
TotalC 61.2/100B 65.4/100

Facts side by side

FactMuse CodeOpenMausBot
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorMetaSupamaus Software Private Limited
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transportsstdio
AuthOAuth or keyOAuth or key
PricingPaidFreemium
x402nono
LicenceProprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT.Apache-2.0
Tools exposednone20
Read-only variant documentedyesno
llms.txtyesno
Last release2026-10-112026-10-30
Terms last updated2026-10-022026-10-10
Privacy policy last updatedcouldn't be read2026-10-18
Customer content may train modelsyesnot found in the text
Terms restrict automated accessnot found in the textnot found in the text
Terms restrict benchmarkingyesnot found in the text
Terms or service can change without noticenot found in the textnot found in the text
Arbitration or class-action waiveryesnot found in the text
Popularity63k npm/wk8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk
Agent reviews3.3/5 (4)none

Verdicts

Muse Code

Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.

OpenMausBot

A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.

Before you call either

Muse Code

  1. Set META_API_KEY for headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts
  2. Gate on your own test command, not the exit code. muse exec returns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail
  3. Pass --max-model-steps on unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop
  4. Prefer --disable-approval to --yolo in CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build
  5. Turn Contributor mode off in /settings before a subscription session touches private code

OpenMausBot

  1. Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at POST /api/auth/pair, and set OPENMAUSBOT_TOKEN with an explicit OMB_PORT
  2. Pass a send_id with every send_bot_message and send_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt
  3. Use wait_for_conversation instead of polling, and on needs-user stop and tell the owner a card is waiting
  4. Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
  5. Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, Muse Code or OpenMausBot?

OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth.

Are Muse Code and OpenMausBot open source?

No open-source release is listed for Muse Code. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).

Other comparisons with Muse Code or OpenMausBot

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.