Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
Muse Code vs OpenMausBot
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 875 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.
Ahead on
- Security & auth, 67 against 59
Watch for
Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates
Best for A person or an outside agent who wants several CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Grok, ACP CLIs) organised as named bots with their own computers, routines and approvals, driven by MCP or a CLI.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 60 against 45
- Schema & documentation, 90 against 84
- Payments & pricing, 50 against 20
Also in its favour
- Runs on your own machine
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
New bots start at Full access, which approves provider permission requests without a card
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | Muse Code | OpenMausBot | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 45 | 60 | OpenMausBot +15 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 84 | 90 | OpenMausBot +6 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 79 | 77 | Muse Code +2 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 67 | 59 | Muse Code +8 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 20 | 50 | OpenMausBot +30 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 75 | 74 | Muse Code +1 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 56 | 59 | OpenMausBot +3 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | 0 | -2 | |
| Total | C 61.2/100 | B 65.4/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | Muse Code | OpenMausBot |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | Meta | Supamaus Software Private Limited |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | stdio | |
| Auth | OAuth or key | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Paid | Freemium |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. | Apache-2.0 |
| Tools exposed | none | 20 |
| Read-only variant documented | yes | no |
| llms.txt | yes | no |
| Last release | 2026-10-11 | 2026-10-30 |
| Terms last updated | 2026-10-02 | 2026-10-10 |
| Privacy policy last updated | couldn't be read | 2026-10-18 |
| Customer content may train models | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict automated access | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Terms restrict benchmarking | yes | not found in the text |
| Terms or service can change without notice | not found in the text | not found in the text |
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | yes | not found in the text |
| Popularity | 63k npm/wk | 8.2k stars, 3.5k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3.3/5 (4) | none |
Verdicts
Muse Code
Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.
OpenMausBot
A bounded 20-tool MCP server with typed schemas, annotations and idempotent sends, and a headless CLI with JSON output and exit codes, let another agent hand work to a bot team and wait on it. New bots start at Full access, so provider permission requests pass without a card, and usage analytics stay on until switched off.
Before you call either
Muse Code
- Set
META_API_KEYfor headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts - Gate on your own test command, not the exit code.
muse execreturns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail - Pass
--max-model-stepson unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop - Prefer
--disable-approvalto--yoloin CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build - Turn Contributor mode off in
/settingsbefore a subscription session touches private code
OpenMausBot
- Ask the owner for a pairing code from Settings > Phone, exchange it at
POST /api/auth/pair, and setOPENMAUSBOT_TOKENwith an explicitOMB_PORT - Pass a
send_idwith everysend_bot_messageandsend_channel_message, so a retry returns the first receipt - Use
wait_for_conversationinstead of polling, and onneeds-userstop and tell the owner a card is waiting - Check a bot's access level with the owner before sending work. New bots run at Full access unless defaults were changed
- Ask the owner to switch off Settings > General > Usage analytics if nothing beyond model calls should leave the machine
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, Muse Code or OpenMausBot?
OpenMausBot scores 65.4 (B) on agent readiness against Muse Code's 61.2 (C), and leads in 4 of 7 scored categories. Muse Code leads on security & auth.
Are Muse Code and OpenMausBot open source?
No open-source release is listed for Muse Code. OpenMausBot is open source (Apache-2.0).
Other comparisons with Muse Code or OpenMausBot
- Agent Zero vs Muse Code
- Agent Zero vs OpenMausBot
- Aider vs Muse Code
- Aider vs OpenMausBot
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Amp vs OpenMausBot
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Claude Code vs Muse Code
- Claude Code vs OpenMausBot
- Cline vs Muse Code
- Cline vs OpenMausBot
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Crush vs OpenMausBot
- Cursor CLI vs Muse Code
- Cursor CLI vs OpenMausBot
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Muse Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs OpenMausBot
- Devin vs Muse Code
- Devin vs OpenMausBot
- Droid CLI vs Muse Code
- Droid CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Pi vs Muse Code
- Pi vs OpenMausBot
- Gemini CLI vs Muse Code
- Gemini CLI vs OpenMausBot
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Muse Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs OpenMausBot
- goose vs Muse Code
- goose vs OpenMausBot
- Harness² vs Muse Code
- Harness² vs OpenMausBot
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs OpenMausBot
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Jules vs OpenMausBot
- Junie CLI vs Muse Code
- Junie CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kilo Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Kiro CLI vs Muse Code
- Kiro CLI vs OpenMausBot
- mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenMausBot
- MiniMax Code vs Muse Code
- MiniMax Code vs OpenMausBot
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Muse Code
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs OpenAI Codex
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenHands
- Muse Code vs Prime Agent
- Muse Code vs Qoder CLI
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Mirror CLI
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Unstoppable
- Muse Code vs Vibe-Trading
- Muse Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- OpenAI Codex vs OpenMausBot
- OpenCode vs OpenMausBot
- OpenHands vs OpenMausBot
- CLI Manager vs Muse Code
- CLI Manager vs OpenMausBot
- Harness vs Muse Code
- Harness vs OpenMausBot
- Muse Code vs Paperclip
- Muse Code vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Paperclip
- OpenMausBot vs Parallax
- OpenMausBot vs Prime Agent
- OpenMausBot vs Qoder CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Qwen Code
- OpenMausBot vs Mirror CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Rovo Dev CLI
- OpenMausBot vs Unstoppable
- OpenMausBot vs Vibe-Trading
- OpenMausBot vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/muse-code-vs-openmausbot.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/muse-code.json·/api/v1/tools/openmausbot.json - From a terminal
anchor compare muse-code openmausbot(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "muse-code", "b": "openmausbot"}at/mcp, no key