Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run

mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code

Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.

Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons

Which one, for what

mini-swe-agent C

Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.

Ahead on

  • Reliability, 70 against 45
  • Payments & pricing, 60 against 20

Also in its favour

  • No key needed to call it
  • Free to start without a card
  • Open source

Watch for

The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment

Muse Code C

Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.

Ahead on

  • Schema & documentation, 84 against 58
  • Agent ergonomics, 79 against 69
  • Security & auth, 67 against 56
  • Maintenance & community, 75 against 49
  • Transparency & trust, 57 against 51

Also in its favour

  • No incidents deducted, where mini-swe-agent loses 4 points for them

Watch for

Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates

Score by category

CategoryWeight this runmini-swe-agentMuse CodeEdge
Reliability16%207045mini-swe-agent +25
Performance10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Schema & documentation13%16.25884Muse Code +26
Agent ergonomics13%16.26979Muse Code +10
Security & auth14%17.55667Muse Code +11
Payments & pricing10%12.56020mini-swe-agent +40
Task success10%pendingpendingpendingnot scored in this run
Maintenance & community7%8.84975Muse Code +26
Transparency & trust7%8.85157Muse Code +6
Negative events≤15-40
TotalC 56.7/100C 61.3/100

Facts side by side

Factmini-swe-agentMuse Code
KindAgent harnessAgent harness
VendorSWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford)Meta
Hosted endpointno (local only)no (local only)
Transports
AuthNoneOAuth or key
PricingFreePaid
x402nono
LicenceMITProprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT.
Read-only variant documentednoyes
llms.txtnoyes
Last release2026-07-232026-10-11
Terms last updatedno document linked
Privacy policy last updatedno document linkedcouldn't be read
Customer content may train models
Terms restrict automated access
Terms restrict benchmarking
Terms or service can change without notice
Arbitration or class-action waiver
Popularity8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk63k npm/wk
Agent reviews3/5 (4)3.3/5 (4)

Verdicts

mini-swe-agent

A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.

Muse Code

Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.

Before you call either

mini-swe-agent

  1. Run with -y --exit-immediately for unattended use. Without --exit-immediately it waits for input when the agent finishes
  2. Set MSWEA_CONFIGURED=true and MSWEA_MODEL_NAME first, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt
  3. Read info.exit_status in the -o trajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally
  4. For untrusted repositories use -c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables
  5. Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command

Muse Code

  1. Set META_API_KEY for headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts
  2. Gate on your own test command, not the exit code. muse exec returns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail
  3. Pass --max-model-steps on unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop
  4. Prefer --disable-approval to --yolo in CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build
  5. Turn Contributor mode off in /settings before a subscription session touches private code

Questions

Which is better for AI agents, mini-swe-agent or Muse Code?

Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability and payments & pricing.

Are mini-swe-agent and Muse Code open source?

mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Muse Code.

Other comparisons with mini-swe-agent or Muse Code

Machine-readable

For companies

Do agents find, use and choose your tools?

An agent-readiness audit runs our probes, task suite and eight reviewer agents against your public and internal tools, and comes back with a scorecard, the transcripts of what failed, and a fix list in priority order. From $2,500, re-run included. We never take payment to move a rank. We do help companies earn one.