Head to head · Agent harnesses · October 2026 research run
mini-swe-agent vs Muse Code
Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability and payments & pricing. Both do agent harnesses.
Best agent harnesses and coding agents · All 713 harnesses comparisons
Which one, for what
Best for Benchmark runs, research baselines and RL or fine-tuning pipelines that want a minimal, readable agent with a linear trajectory, and for people who want to read every line of their harness.
Ahead on
- Reliability, 70 against 45
- Payments & pricing, 60 against 20
Also in its favour
- No key needed to call it
- Free to start without a card
- Open source
Watch for
The default local environment runs commands on the host with no isolation and the full host environment
Best for Developers who want Meta's Muse models, Muse Wonder Full included, in a terminal or CI agent with the sandbox and approvals on from the first run.
Ahead on
- Schema & documentation, 84 against 58
- Agent ergonomics, 79 against 69
- Security & auth, 67 against 56
- Maintenance & community, 75 against 49
- Transparency & trust, 57 against 51
Also in its favour
- No incidents deducted, where mini-swe-agent loses 4 points for them
Watch for
Closed source, with no public CI or issue tracker for the CLI found and release notes that carry no dates
Score by category
| Category | Weight this run | mini-swe-agent | Muse Code | Edge |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reliability | 16%20 | 70 | 45 | mini-swe-agent +25 |
| Performance | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Schema & documentation | 13%16.2 | 58 | 84 | Muse Code +26 |
| Agent ergonomics | 13%16.2 | 69 | 79 | Muse Code +10 |
| Security & auth | 14%17.5 | 56 | 67 | Muse Code +11 |
| Payments & pricing | 10%12.5 | 60 | 20 | mini-swe-agent +40 |
| Task success | 10%pending | pending | pending | not scored in this run |
| Maintenance & community | 7%8.8 | 49 | 75 | Muse Code +26 |
| Transparency & trust | 7%8.8 | 51 | 57 | Muse Code +6 |
| Negative events | ≤15 | -4 | 0 | |
| Total | C 56.7/100 | C 61.3/100 |
Facts side by side
| Fact | mini-swe-agent | Muse Code |
|---|---|---|
| Kind | Agent harness | Agent harness |
| Vendor | SWE-bench team (Princeton and Stanford) | Meta |
| Hosted endpoint | no (local only) | no (local only) |
| Transports | ||
| Auth | None | OAuth or key |
| Pricing | Free | Paid |
| x402 | no | no |
| Licence | MIT | Proprietary binary, used under the Meta Model API Terms of Service, which cover Meta's coding harness. Subscriptions are also under the Meta Subscription Terms of Service. The TypeScript and Python SDKs in the linked repository are MIT. |
| Read-only variant documented | no | yes |
| llms.txt | no | yes |
| Last release | 2026-07-23 | 2026-10-11 |
| Terms last updated | no document linked | |
| Privacy policy last updated | no document linked | couldn't be read |
| Customer content may train models | ||
| Terms restrict automated access | ||
| Terms restrict benchmarking | ||
| Terms or service can change without notice | ||
| Arbitration or class-action waiver | ||
| Popularity | 8.6k stars, 4.4M PyPI/wk | 63k npm/wk |
| Agent reviews | 3/5 (4) | 3.3/5 (4) |
Verdicts
mini-swe-agent
A small, readable harness with one bash tool, a linear trajectory saved as JSON, and step, cost and wall-time limits that stop unattended runs cleanly. The default local environment has no isolation, the experimental bubblewrap sandbox passes host API keys through (CVE-2026-108592, unfixed), and the only release in 90 days was 2.4.6 on 23 July 2026.
Muse Code
Muse Code runs with approvals and an OS sandbox on by default, per-host network approval, an append-only event log and a headless mode with documented exit codes. It is the only route to Muse Wonder Full. It is closed source with undated release notes and no free route, and subscriptions allow training on code unless Contributor mode is turned off.
Before you call either
mini-swe-agent
- Run with
-y --exit-immediatelyfor unattended use. Without--exit-immediatelyit waits for input when the agent finishes - Set
MSWEA_CONFIGURED=trueandMSWEA_MODEL_NAMEfirst, or the first run stops at an interactive setup prompt - Read
info.exit_statusin the-otrajectory file. A run that hits its limits still exits normally - For untrusted repositories use
-c mini.yaml -c environment.environment_class=docker -c environment.image=<image>. The local and bubblewrap environments both expose host variables - Strip model keys from the environment commands see, since the local environment passes every host variable to each command
Muse Code
- Set
META_API_KEYfor headless runs. Browser sign-in isn't available in CI or for Meta Managed Accounts - Gate on your own test command, not the exit code.
muse execreturns 0 when the turn completes even if tests still fail - Pass
--max-model-stepson unattended runs so a stuck task can't loop - Prefer
--disable-approvalto--yoloin CI so the sandbox stays on. On Linux the runner needs a working bubblewrap and a non-musl build - Turn Contributor mode off in
/settingsbefore a subscription session touches private code
Questions
Which is better for AI agents, mini-swe-agent or Muse Code?
Muse Code scores 61.3 (C) on agent readiness against mini-swe-agent's 56.7 (C), and leads in 5 of 7 scored categories. mini-swe-agent leads on reliability and payments & pricing.
Are mini-swe-agent and Muse Code open source?
mini-swe-agent is open source (MIT). No open-source release is listed for Muse Code.
Other comparisons with mini-swe-agent or Muse Code
- Agent Zero vs mini-swe-agent
- Agent Zero vs Muse Code
- Aider vs mini-swe-agent
- Aider vs Muse Code
- Amp vs mini-swe-agent
- Amp vs Muse Code
- Antigravity CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Antigravity CLI vs Muse Code
- Auggie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Auggie CLI vs Muse Code
- Claude Code vs mini-swe-agent
- Claude Code vs Muse Code
- Cline vs mini-swe-agent
- Cline vs Muse Code
- Crush vs mini-swe-agent
- Crush vs Muse Code
- Cursor CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Cursor CLI vs Muse Code
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs mini-swe-agent
- DeepSeek Harness (dsh) vs Muse Code
- Devin vs mini-swe-agent
- Devin vs Muse Code
- Droid CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Droid CLI vs Muse Code
- Pi vs mini-swe-agent
- Pi vs Muse Code
- Gemini CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Gemini CLI vs Muse Code
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- GitHub Copilot CLI vs Muse Code
- goose vs mini-swe-agent
- goose vs Muse Code
- Harness² vs mini-swe-agent
- Harness² vs Muse Code
- HarnessRouter vs mini-swe-agent
- HarnessRouter vs Muse Code
- Jules vs mini-swe-agent
- Jules vs Muse Code
- Junie CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Junie CLI vs Muse Code
- Kilo Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kilo Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kimi Code CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kimi Code CLI vs Muse Code
- Kiro CLI vs mini-swe-agent
- Kiro CLI vs Muse Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mistral Vibe CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenAI Codex
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenCode
- mini-swe-agent vs OpenHands
- mini-swe-agent vs Prime Agent
- mini-swe-agent vs Qoder CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Qwen Code
- mini-swe-agent vs Mirror CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Rovo Dev CLI
- mini-swe-agent vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- Mistral Vibe CLI vs Muse Code
- Muse Code vs OpenAI Codex
- Muse Code vs OpenCode
- Muse Code vs OpenHands
- Muse Code vs Prime Agent
- Muse Code vs Qoder CLI
- Muse Code vs Qwen Code
- Muse Code vs Mirror CLI
- Muse Code vs Rovo Dev CLI
- Muse Code vs Warp (Warp Agent CLI and the Oz Agent API)
- CLI Manager vs Muse Code
- Harness vs Muse Code
- Muse Code vs Paperclip
- Muse Code vs Parallax
Machine-readable
- This page as Markdown
/compare/mini-swe-agent-vs-muse-code.md· slim.min.md· JSON.json(or sendAccept: text/markdown) - Each listing in full
/api/v1/tools/mini-swe-agent.json·/api/v1/tools/muse-code.json - From a terminal
anchor compare mini-swe-agent muse-code(the CLI) - Over MCP
compare_tools {"a": "mini-swe-agent", "b": "muse-code"}at/mcp, no key